H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Magnus Norman vs Max Mirnyi H2H: 2-1
Magnus Norman holds a 2–1 lead over Max Mirnyi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Max Mirnyi won the 2001 Marseille fourth round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2001* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Magnus Norman | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Magnus Norman | 3-6 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 7-6(9) | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
| Apr 24, 1999* | Orlando | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Magnus Norman | 6-2 6-1 | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Max Mirnyi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |