H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Magnus Norman vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 1-0
Magnus Norman holds a 1–0 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 1997 Bastad third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 1997* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Magnus Norman | 6-4 7-5 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |