H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Magnus Norman vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 3-2

Magnus Norman holds a 3–2 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Magnus Norman leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 2003 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Norman
SWE Age 50 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 16, 2003* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Magnus Norman #94 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #42 Match data
Mar 14, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #27 4-6 6-1 6-1 Magnus Norman #5 Match data
Nov 13, 1999* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard Magnus Norman #19 6-1 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #8 Match data
Jul 24, 1999* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 QF Clay Magnus Norman #49 7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 Nicolas Lapentti #22 Match data
Jan 22, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #91 7-6(4) 3-6 2-6 6-3 6-4 Magnus Norman #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Norman #500 #2 3,610 2,041 234 163 58.9% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Norman Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #690 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1995 3–2 60.0% #170 1,542 0 0 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 1996 13–10 56.5% #86 1,672 0 0 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 1997 42–26 61.8% #22 1,822 0 1 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 1998 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 2 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 1999 43–21 67.2% #15 1,890 0 7 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 2000 64–23 73.6% #4 1,885 0 12 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 2001 23–17 57.5% #49 1,751 0 12 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 2002 12–19 38.7% #107 1,673 0 12 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 2003 10–16 38.5% #125 1,595 0 12 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5