H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magnus Norman vs Pat Cash H2H: 1-0
Magnus Norman holds a 1–0 lead over Pat Cash in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 1997 Chennai fourth round 6-7(3) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1997* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Magnus Norman | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-3 | Pat Cash | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Pat Cash | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 |
| 24 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 |