H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Magnus Norman vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 0-1

Paul Haarhuis holds a 1–0 lead over Magnus Norman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1997 New Haven round of 64 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Norman
SWE Age 50 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Paul Haarhuis
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Haarhuis #79 6-3 6-2 Magnus Norman #26 Match data Aug 13, 1997* R64 New Haven Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magnus Norman #500 #2 3,610 2,041 236 164 59.0% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,887 251 247 50.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Norman Paul Haarhuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #690 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 3–2 60.0% #170 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1996 13–10 56.5% #86 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1997 42–26 61.8% #22 1,825 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1998 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 2 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0
23 1999 43–21 67.2% #15 1,890 0 7 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0
24 2000 66–24 73.3% #4 1,862 0 12 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,670 0 0
25 2001 23–17 57.5% #49 1,746 0 12 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,729 0 0
26 2002 12–19 38.7% #107 1,672 0 12 1992 33–29 53.2% #39 1,684 0 0
27 2003 10–16 38.5% #125 1,594 0 12 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,764 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,715 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,715 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 30–28 51.7% #25 1,735 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,674 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,660 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magnus Norman Paul Haarhuis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 9 10 19 47.4% 20 7 27 74.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 6 13 19 31.6% 13 10 23 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1999 22 10 32 68.8% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 39 16 55 70.9% 26 6 32 81.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 2001 18 11 29 62.1% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 1991 14 11 25 56.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 1992 20 12 32 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
27 2003 5 6 11 45.5% 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 13 8 21 61.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 13 13 26 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 7 11 18 38.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 6 10 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 112 82 194 57.7% 103 61 164 62.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 14 13 27 51.9% — 111 98 209 53.1% 56 70 126 44.4% 28 25 53 52.8% 56 54 110 50.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 345/400 of Magnus Norman's and 380/436 of Paul Haarhuis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magnus Norman Paul Haarhuis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1992 1/1 2.0 5.0 46.5% 50.0% 43.5% 50.0% — 46.5% 27.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 5/5 2.0 1.0 58.3% 66.1% 42.1% 45.9% 61.6% 56.6% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 21/23 6.2 2.0 60.3% 72.6% 52.3% 59.5% 51.1% 64.1% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 62/68 8.9 3.2 52.5% 73.7% 50.1% 66.5% 40.4% 62.3% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 44/52 6.8 3.5 50.7% 70.4% 47.7% 60.2% 37.2% 59.0% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 58/64 4.6 2.4 56.9% 74.3% 53.1% 64.1% 44.8% 65.3% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 72/90 6.6 2.2 62.8% 74.1% 53.1% 60.4% 45.8% 66.2% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 36/40 5.5 2.1 59.7% 69.7% 50.6% 58.4% 49.5% 61.9% 40.1% 1991 44/50 3.8 2.3 58.4% 68.3% 52.1% 45.9% 48.3% 61.5% 40.2%
26 2002 20/31 5.4 1.9 60.0% 66.6% 53.4% 55.4% 46.7% 61.7% 37.4% 1992 55/62 4.0 1.9 59.8% 70.2% 51.8% 63.1% 41.7% 62.7% 38.0%
27 2003 26/26 5.0 2.8 54.7% 72.4% 48.4% 51.6% 42.4% 61.0% 34.8% 1993 51/56 4.0 2.0 59.5% 69.2% 52.2% 60.9% 43.4% 62.2% 38.2%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 43/48 4.2 2.0 59.7% 68.8% 50.0% 64.0% 48.8% 61.1% 37.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 55/57 4.6 2.6 59.8% 68.3% 50.7% 54.3% 40.4% 61.0% 36.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 48/58 4.2 1.8 62.5% 68.2% 51.8% 50.8% 44.9% 62.2% 35.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 37/44 5.3 2.8 59.7% 71.9% 51.2% 59.4% 46.1% 63.5% 37.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 30/40 5.8 3.2 56.4% 71.4% 50.5% 60.7% 45.0% 62.5% 36.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 17/21 5.3 2.4 61.5% 68.9% 48.6% 61.8% 29.9% 61.0% 36.2%
Career — 345/400 6.3 2.6 57.0% 72.3% 51.0% 60.6% 44.2% 63.0% 39.3% — 380/498 4.4 2.3 59.7% 69.4% 51.2% 57.5% 43.9% 62.0% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magnus Norman Paul Haarhuis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1992 1489 97.1 -2.65 -0.49 0.510 36.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1543 116.2 -0.81 +1.84 1.024 50.4% — +44 — 60.0% +0.60 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 1673 132.2 +1.15 +0.51 1.073 51.5% -81 -5 — 54.2% +0.17 6–4 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 106.7 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 1826 144.4 +0.12 +0.66 1.000 50.4% -71 +28 -150 57.8% +0.31 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) 110.1 -2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 1720 134.9 -2.02 -0.53 0.893 48.2% -36 +101 -63 43.7% -0.53 10–6 (63%) 13–11 (54%) 103.8 -1.55 1988 1489 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04
23 1999 1890 143.4 +3.19 +3.30 1.209 53.2% -71 +6 -255 63.9% +1.14 9–8 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 98.8 +0.39 1989 1636 132.2 — — — — -19 -43 — 54.3% +0.30 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 101.8 +0.52
24 2000 1863 155.8 +4.09 +4.23 1.245 53.7% -12 +197 — 68.3% +1.04 15–11 (58%) 19–14 (58%) 98.2 +0.50 1990 1670 140.9 — — — — -4 -37 -64 46.9% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) 100.3 -1.33
25 2001 1747 136.1 -0.01 +1.60 1.054 51.1% +59 +154 — 57.1% +0.21 6–5 (55%) 10–8 (56%) 97.1 +1.62 1991 1730 144.8 +0.85 +1.66 1.042 50.8% +15 -61 -171 51.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) 102.5 -2.69
26 2002 1672 129.6 -0.57 -0.27 0.977 49.8% +62 +78 — 40.6% -0.62 3–6 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 94.2 -0.34 1992 1685 143.9 +1.01 +0.37 1.019 50.2% +33 -24 — 50.3% +0.07 9–8 (53%) 12–15 (44%) 99.9 -0.46
27 2003 1595 121.7 -0.64 -1.88 0.892 48.0% +92 +37 — 40.7% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 7–3 (70%) 102.0 +0.28 1993 1764 141.2 +1.06 +0.08 1.010 50.5% -19 +4 -232 53.5% +0.17 8–9 (47%) 11–11 (50%) 102.1 -0.40
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1715 147.9 +0.13 -0.29 0.953 49.4% +46 +62 — 50.8% -0.08 10–4 (71%) 8–9 (47%) 104.6 -1.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1716 137.5 -0.59 -0.36 0.931 48.7% +46 -19 -93 50.0% -0.17 18–5 (78%) 11–12 (48%) 106.7 +0.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1736 139.0 +0.20 -0.84 0.946 49.0% +10 -47 -15 46.6% -0.19 12–5 (71%) 13–16 (45%) 105.2 +0.88
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1675 138.9 +1.41 -0.41 1.025 50.4% -16 -7 +99 48.7% +0.13 5–13 (28%) 14–12 (54%) 93.4 -0.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1660 132.7 +0.38 -1.61 0.960 49.6% +19 -37 +79 48.4% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) 103.3 +1.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1620 127.7 -0.68 -0.73 0.928 48.6% +35 -73 +103 42.4% -0.44 0–6 (0%) 2–7 (22%) 89.4 -1.04
Career — 2041 146.5 +1.12 +1.55 1.063 51.2% -17 +80 -164 56.7% +0.36 65–54 (55%) 83–69 (55%) 103.9 -0.26 — 1888 146.0 +0.48 -0.13 0.982 49.8% +17 -22 -15 49.4% 0.00 84–71 (54%) 97–108 (47%) 102.8 -1.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.