H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Magnus Norman vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 2-3

Richard Krajicek holds a 3–2 lead over Magnus Norman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 2000 Long Island semifinal 4-6 6-4 7-6(0).

SWE Age 50 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 26, 2000* Long Island ATP 250 SF Hard Magnus Norman #3 4-6 6-4 7-6(0) Richard Krajicek #25 Match data
Aug 2, 2000* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Richard Krajicek #24 7-5 7-6(7) Magnus Norman #3 Match data
Apr 28, 2000* Barcelona ATP 250 R16 Clay Magnus Norman #4 7-6(2) 6-4 Richard Krajicek #37 Match data
Oct 29, 1998* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Richard Krajicek #11 6-4 6-1 Magnus Norman #52 Match data
Apr 18, 1997* Tokyo ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Krajicek #6 7-5 6-0 Magnus Norman #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Norman #500 #2 3,610 2,041 234 163 58.9% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Norman Richard Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #690 1,489 0 0
19 1995 3–2 60.0% #170 1,542 0 0 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1
20 1996 13–10 56.5% #86 1,672 0 0 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3
21 1997 42–26 61.8% #22 1,822 0 1 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4
22 1998 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 2 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7
23 1999 43–21 67.2% #15 1,890 0 7 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9
24 2000 64–23 73.6% #4 1,885 0 12 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10
25 2001 23–17 57.5% #49 1,751 0 12 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13
26 2002 12–19 38.7% #107 1,673 0 12 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15
27 2003 10–16 38.5% #125 1,595 0 12 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17
28 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17
30 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17
31 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17