H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Magnus Norman vs Tim Henman H2H: 1-1

Magnus Norman and Tim Henman are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 1998 Antwerp round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Norman
SWE Age 50 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magnus Norman #24 7-5 6-3 Tim Henman #17 Match data Feb 19, 1998* R32 Antwerp ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tim Henman #20 6-3 6-2 Magnus Norman #29 Match data Oct 4, 1997* QF Swiss Indoors World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magnus Norman #500 #2 3,610 2,041 236 164 59.0% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Norman Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #690 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 3–2 60.0% #170 1,543 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1996 13–10 56.5% #86 1,673 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 1997 42–26 61.8% #22 1,825 0 1 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 1998 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 2 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1999 43–21 67.2% #15 1,890 0 7 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2000 66–24 73.3% #4 1,862 0 12 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 2001 23–17 57.5% #49 1,746 0 12 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 2002 12–19 38.7% #107 1,672 0 12 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 2003 10–16 38.5% #125 1,594 0 12 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magnus Norman Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1997 9 10 19 47.4% 20 7 27 74.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 1998 6 13 19 31.6% 13 10 23 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 1999 22 10 32 68.8% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2000 39 16 55 70.9% 26 6 32 81.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 2001 18 11 29 62.1% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2003 5 6 11 45.5% 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 112 82 194 57.7% 103 61 164 62.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 14 13 27 51.9% — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 345/400 of Magnus Norman's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magnus Norman Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1992 1/1 2.0 5.0 46.5% 50.0% 43.5% 50.0% — 46.5% 27.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 5/5 2.0 1.0 58.3% 66.1% 42.1% 45.9% 61.6% 56.6% 44.5% 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 1996 21/23 6.2 2.0 60.3% 72.6% 52.3% 59.5% 51.1% 64.1% 38.6% 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 1997 62/68 8.9 3.2 52.5% 73.7% 50.1% 66.5% 40.4% 62.3% 37.7% 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 1998 44/52 6.8 3.5 50.7% 70.4% 47.7% 60.2% 37.2% 59.0% 36.6% 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 1999 58/64 4.6 2.4 56.9% 74.3% 53.1% 64.1% 44.8% 65.3% 42.0% 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 2000 72/90 6.6 2.2 62.8% 74.1% 53.1% 60.4% 45.8% 66.2% 42.0% 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 2001 36/40 5.5 2.1 59.7% 69.7% 50.6% 58.4% 49.5% 61.9% 40.1% 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 2002 20/31 5.4 1.9 60.0% 66.6% 53.4% 55.4% 46.7% 61.7% 37.4% 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 2003 26/26 5.0 2.8 54.7% 72.4% 48.4% 51.6% 42.4% 61.0% 34.8% 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%
Career — 345/400 6.3 2.6 57.0% 72.3% 51.0% 60.6% 44.2% 63.0% 39.3% — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magnus Norman Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1992 1489 97.1 -2.65 -0.49 0.510 36.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1543 116.2 -0.81 +1.84 1.024 50.4% — +44 — 60.0% +0.60 — — — -0.23 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33
20 1996 1673 132.2 +1.15 +0.51 1.073 51.5% -81 -5 — 54.2% +0.17 6–4 (60%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.42 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04
21 1997 1826 144.4 +0.12 +0.66 1.000 50.4% -71 +28 -150 57.8% +0.31 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) — -2.25 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81
22 1998 1720 134.9 -2.02 -0.53 0.893 48.2% -36 +101 -63 43.7% -0.53 10–6 (63%) 13–11 (54%) — -1.55 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85
23 1999 1890 143.4 +3.19 +3.30 1.209 53.2% -71 +6 -255 63.9% +1.14 9–8 (53%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.39 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62
24 2000 1863 155.8 +4.09 +4.23 1.245 53.7% -12 +197 — 68.3% +1.04 15–11 (58%) 19–14 (58%) — +0.50 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72
25 2001 1747 136.1 -0.01 +1.60 1.054 51.1% +59 +154 — 57.1% +0.21 6–5 (55%) 10–8 (56%) — +1.62 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25
26 2002 1672 129.6 -0.57 -0.27 0.977 49.8% +62 +78 — 40.6% -0.62 3–6 (33%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.34 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30
27 2003 1595 121.7 -0.64 -1.88 0.892 48.0% +92 +37 — 40.7% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 7–3 (70%) — +0.28 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06
Career — 2041 146.5 +1.12 +1.55 1.063 51.2% -17 +80 -164 56.7% +0.36 65–54 (55%) 83–69 (55%) 103.9 -0.26 — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.