H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Magnus Norman vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 1-1

Magnus Norman and Todd Woodbridge are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 2001 Sydney International round of 16 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Norman
SWE Age 50 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Todd Woodbridge
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magnus Norman #4 6-3 6-1 Todd Woodbridge #188 Match data Jan 12, 2001* R16 Sydney International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Todd Woodbridge #32 7-5 6-3 Magnus Norman #91 Match data Feb 21, 1997* R16 Memphis Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magnus Norman #500 #2 3,610 2,041 236 164 59.0% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,870 239 231 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Norman Todd Woodbridge
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #690 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0
19 1995 3–2 60.0% #170 1,543 0 0 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0
20 1996 13–10 56.5% #86 1,673 0 0 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,703 0 0
21 1997 42–26 61.8% #22 1,825 0 1 1992 25–23 52.1% #54 1,675 0 0
22 1998 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 2 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,665 0 0
23 1999 43–21 67.2% #15 1,890 0 7 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,662 0 0
24 2000 66–24 73.3% #4 1,862 0 12 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,811 0 1
25 2001 23–17 57.5% #49 1,746 0 12 1996 34–24 58.6% #36 1,754 0 1
26 2002 12–19 38.7% #107 1,672 0 12 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,801 0 2
27 2003 10–16 38.5% #125 1,594 0 12 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,716 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,602 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,597 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magnus Norman Todd Woodbridge
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 1995 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
21 1997 9 10 19 47.4% 20 7 27 74.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1998 6 13 19 31.6% 13 10 23 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1999 22 10 32 68.8% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2000 39 16 55 70.9% 26 6 32 81.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2001 18 11 29 62.1% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 1996 20 13 33 60.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4%
26 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 1997 22 12 34 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2003 5 6 11 45.5% 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 6 10 16 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
Career — 112 82 194 57.7% 103 61 164 62.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 14 13 27 51.9% — 146 131 277 52.7% 21 32 53 39.6% 43 31 74 58.1% 29 37 66 43.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 345/400 of Magnus Norman's and 360/418 of Todd Woodbridge's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magnus Norman Todd Woodbridge
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1992 1/1 2.0 5.0 46.5% 50.0% 43.5% 50.0% — 46.5% 27.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 5/5 2.0 1.0 58.3% 66.1% 42.1% 45.9% 61.6% 56.6% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 21/23 6.2 2.0 60.3% 72.6% 52.3% 59.5% 51.1% 64.1% 38.6% 1991 37/48 2.0 3.4 59.8% 67.3% 50.1% 57.0% 43.8% 60.2% 39.6%
21 1997 62/68 8.9 3.2 52.5% 73.7% 50.1% 66.5% 40.4% 62.3% 37.7% 1992 44/48 2.7 4.8 60.3% 69.2% 48.5% 59.9% 40.7% 60.9% 40.9%
22 1998 44/52 6.8 3.5 50.7% 70.4% 47.7% 60.2% 37.2% 59.0% 36.6% 1993 33/39 2.4 4.5 60.5% 67.2% 47.6% 51.3% 41.8% 59.2% 39.6%
23 1999 58/64 4.6 2.4 56.9% 74.3% 53.1% 64.1% 44.8% 65.3% 42.0% 1994 30/34 3.4 4.9 59.1% 70.6% 45.0% 55.4% 47.1% 60.1% 37.2%
24 2000 72/90 6.6 2.2 62.8% 74.1% 53.1% 60.4% 45.8% 66.2% 42.0% 1995 50/54 2.7 4.6 57.9% 70.2% 48.3% 60.0% 42.9% 61.3% 38.1%
25 2001 36/40 5.5 2.1 59.7% 69.7% 50.6% 58.4% 49.5% 61.9% 40.1% 1996 51/58 3.3 5.3 56.7% 69.0% 48.1% 55.8% 42.8% 60.0% 39.2%
26 2002 20/31 5.4 1.9 60.0% 66.6% 53.4% 55.4% 46.7% 61.7% 37.4% 1997 42/51 3.6 4.0 58.4% 70.3% 46.0% 60.1% 45.6% 60.2% 41.4%
27 2003 26/26 5.0 2.8 54.7% 72.4% 48.4% 51.6% 42.4% 61.0% 34.8% 1998 36/42 3.3 4.4 59.1% 64.4% 45.6% 54.0% 46.9% 56.8% 39.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 17/24 3.7 4.1 62.5% 66.7% 47.9% 51.7% 49.4% 60.0% 34.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 10/10 2.3 4.2 60.2% 66.6% 49.1% 57.1% 52.0% 59.7% 39.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 10/10 4.2 5.5 59.8% 66.1% 46.9% 59.1% 33.6% 58.5% 39.4%
Career — 345/400 6.3 2.6 57.0% 72.3% 51.0% 60.6% 44.2% 63.0% 39.3% — 360/470 3.0 4.5 59.1% 68.4% 47.6% 56.8% 44.0% 59.9% 39.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magnus Norman Todd Woodbridge
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1992 1489 97.1 -2.65 -0.49 0.510 36.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1453 103.4 — — — — +59 — — 21.1% -1.53 — 0–1 — +0.38
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1573 126.2 — — — — +14 — — 44.1% -0.68 2–0 5–2 (71%) — -0.39
19 1995 1543 116.2 -0.81 +1.84 1.024 50.4% — +44 — 60.0% +0.60 — — — -0.23 1990 1705 141.6 — — — — +26 -177 — 47.3% -0.16 8–7 (53%) 8–5 (62%) 106.3 -0.46
20 1996 1673 132.2 +1.15 +0.51 1.073 51.5% -81 -5 — 54.2% +0.17 6–4 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 106.7 +0.42 1991 1704 135.7 -0.60 +1.97 0.996 49.9% -11 -147 -95 48.4% -0.03 5–3 (63%) 9–8 (53%) 102.3 -0.95
21 1997 1826 144.4 +0.12 +0.66 1.000 50.4% -71 +28 -150 57.8% +0.31 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) 110.1 -2.25 1992 1676 141.7 -0.77 +2.88 1.047 51.0% +48 -130 -62 49.2% +0.12 9–8 (53%) 11–13 (46%) 101.7 -0.18
22 1998 1720 134.9 -2.02 -0.53 0.893 48.2% -36 +101 -63 43.7% -0.53 10–6 (63%) 13–11 (54%) 103.8 -1.55 1993 1665 133.1 -2.39 +1.69 0.971 49.6% +31 -91 -53 46.4% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 99.9 -0.10
23 1999 1890 143.4 +3.19 +3.30 1.209 53.2% -71 +6 -255 63.9% +1.14 9–8 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 98.8 +0.39 1994 1662 123.5 -1.35 -0.55 0.931 48.8% +6 -162 +27 46.2% -0.19 9–8 (53%) 8–10 (44%) 100.1 +1.36
24 2000 1863 155.8 +4.09 +4.23 1.245 53.7% -12 +197 — 68.3% +1.04 15–11 (58%) 19–14 (58%) 98.2 +0.50 1995 1811 136.8 +0.19 +0.89 0.983 49.6% -41 -183 -91 54.0% +0.06 6–6 (50%) 13–7 (65%) 104.8 -2.85
25 2001 1747 136.1 -0.01 +1.60 1.054 51.1% +59 +154 — 57.1% +0.21 6–5 (55%) 10–8 (56%) 97.1 +1.62 1996 1754 142.3 -1.66 +2.21 0.980 49.9% +8 -93 +11 56.4% +0.32 7–4 (64%) 16–12 (57%) 105.8 +0.28
26 2002 1672 129.6 -0.57 -0.27 0.977 49.8% +62 +78 — 40.6% -0.62 3–6 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 94.2 -0.34 1997 1801 143.6 -0.92 +3.35 1.040 50.8% -19 -148 +69 58.1% +0.40 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) 102.4 -0.11
27 2003 1595 121.7 -0.64 -1.88 0.892 48.0% +92 +37 — 40.7% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 7–3 (70%) 102.0 +0.28 1998 1717 136.8 -3.37 +1.99 0.923 48.5% +12 -51 +123 46.8% -0.22 12–2 (86%) 6–12 (33%) 100.6 -0.66
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1603 123.7 -0.75 -0.98 0.870 47.8% +69 -37 +208 35.5% -0.95 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 +0.58
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1589 116.3 -2.34 +1.34 0.976 49.6% +38 — — 48.3% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.9 -0.13
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1598 112.4 -2.79 +0.59 0.950 48.9% -17 — +231 43.3% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.55
Career — 2041 146.5 +1.12 +1.55 1.063 51.2% -17 +80 -164 56.7% +0.36 65–54 (55%) 83–69 (55%) 103.9 -0.26 — 1870 141.5 -1.32 +1.70 0.980 49.7% +10 -122 +24 49.1% -0.07 79–58 (58%) 102–93 (52%) 106.9 -0.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.