H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Magnus Norman vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 1-1
Magnus Norman and Tomas Carbonell are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Carbonell leads 1–0 on clay, while Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 1997 Memphis second round 7-5 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1997* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Magnus Norman | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
| Mar 30, 1996* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Tomas Carbonell | 6-3 6-2 | Magnus Norman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Tomas Carbonell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |