H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magnus Norman vs Wayne Ferreira H2H: 1-1
Magnus Norman and Wayne Ferreira are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 1–0 on clay, while Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 1999 Stockholm fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1999* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Magnus Norman | 7-5 6-2 | Wayne Ferreira | Match data |
| May 29, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Wayne Ferreira | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Magnus Norman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Wayne Ferreira | #1,099 | #6 | 2,701 | 2,022 | 483 | 314 | 60.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Wayne Ferreira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 55–25 | 68.8% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #10 | 1,838 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 13 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 13 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,811 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,692 | 0 | 15 |