H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magnus Norman vs Younes El Aynaoui H2H: 3-1

Magnus Norman holds a 3–1 lead over Younes El Aynaoui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magnus Norman leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Younes El Aynaoui won the 2003 Casablanca fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Norman
SWE Age 50 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Younes El Aynaoui
MAR Age 54 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 11, 2003* Casablanca ATP 250 R16 Clay Younes El Aynaoui #17 6-4 3-6 6-3 Magnus Norman #92 Match data
Aug 26, 2000* Long Island ATP 250 QF Hard Magnus Norman #3 6-3 2-6 6-3 Younes El Aynaoui #22 Match data
May 20, 2000* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Magnus Norman #4 3-6 6-1 6-4 Younes El Aynaoui #15 Match data
Apr 29, 2000* Barcelona ATP 250 QF Clay Magnus Norman #4 6-2 6-4 Younes El Aynaoui #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Norman #500 #2 3,610 2,041 234 163 58.9% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Younes El Aynaoui #1,592 #14 1,635 1,923 243 219 52.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Norman Younes El Aynaoui
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #690 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #351 1,491 0 0
19 1995 3–2 60.0% #170 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1996 13–10 56.5% #86 1,672 0 0 1992 2–1 66.7% #311 1,519 0 0
21 1997 42–26 61.8% #22 1,822 0 1 1993 16–14 53.3% #51 1,632 0 0
22 1998 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 2 1994 15–27 35.7% #117 1,515 0 0
23 1999 43–21 67.2% #15 1,890 0 7 1995 4–5 44.4% #110 1,561 0 0
24 2000 64–23 73.6% #4 1,885 0 12 1996 15–22 40.5% #70 1,569 0 0
25 2001 23–17 57.5% #49 1,751 0 12 1997 2–2 50.0% #237 1,581 0 0
26 2002 12–19 38.7% #107 1,673 0 12 1998 5–2 71.4% #45 1,663 0 0
27 2003 10–16 38.5% #125 1,595 0 12 1999 27–23 54.0% #33 1,727 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2000 36–26 58.1% #25 1,714 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2001 31–23 57.4% #38 1,822 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2002 42–25 62.7% #22 1,773 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2003 38–26 59.4% #14 1,828 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2004 0–4 0.0% #644 1,739 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2005 1–10 9.1% #228 1,597 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #189 1,610 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #167 1,617 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2008 5–2 71.4% #201 1,688 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2010 1–1 50.0% #720 1,679 0 5