H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magnus Tideman vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 1-0
Magnus Tideman holds a 1–0 lead over Balazs Taroczy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magnus Tideman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Tideman won the 1985 Madrid third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 63
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1985* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Magnus Tideman | 6-2 6-3 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Tideman | #828 | #76 | 35 | 1,562 | 14 | 35 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Tideman | Balazs Taroczy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #94 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1984 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #186 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #257 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1986 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #255 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #511 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 |