H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
MaliVai Washington vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-1
MaliVai Washington and Cedric Pioline are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on carpet, while MaliVai Washington leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1993 Antwerp third round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 1993* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Cedric Pioline | 7-5 7-5 | MaliVai Washington | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1993* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | MaliVai Washington | 6-4 6-4 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaliVai Washington | #1,484 | #11 | 2,016 | 1,912 | 249 | 191 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | MaliVai Washington | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #329 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #93 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #50 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #30 | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #26 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #20 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #258 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #178 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #303 | 1,622 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #409 | 1,562 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #513 | 1,548 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #445 | 1,562 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #778 | 1,543 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |