H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
MaliVai Washington vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 3-0
MaliVai Washington holds a 3–0 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, MaliVai Washington leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, MaliVai Washington won the 1996 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1996* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | MaliVai Washington | 6-4 7-5 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1993* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | MaliVai Washington | 4-6 6-1 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
| Jul 18, 1992* | Washington | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | MaliVai Washington | 7-6(4) 7-6(8) | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaliVai Washington | #1,484 | #11 | 2,016 | 1,912 | 249 | 191 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | MaliVai Washington | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #329 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #93 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #50 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #30 | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #26 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #20 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #258 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #178 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #303 | 1,622 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #409 | 1,562 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #513 | 1,548 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #445 | 1,562 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #778 | 1,543 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |