H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

MaliVai Washington vs Jan Kroslak H2H: 2-2

MaliVai Washington and Jan Kroslak are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Kroslak won the 1999 US Open round of 128 6-1 2-6 7-6(3) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

MaliVai Washington
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Jan Kroslak
SVK Age 51 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan Kroslak 6-1 2-6 7-6(3) 7-5 MaliVai Washington #312 Match data Sep 1, 1999* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
MaliVai Washington #13 6-3 7-6(3) Jan Kroslak Match data Jul 26, 1996* R64 Atlanta Olympics Olympics Hard
MaliVai Washington #19 7-6(4) 6-3 Jan Kroslak Match data Feb 22, 1996* R32 Memphis Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jan Kroslak 6-4 6-3 MaliVai Washington #19 Match data Feb 15, 1996* R32 San Jose World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
MaliVai Washington #1,484 #11 2,016 1,912 252 192 56.8% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Jan Kroslak — — — 1,752 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age MaliVai Washington Jan Kroslak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–3 25.0% #329 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 2–5 28.6% #199 1,480 0 0 1995 8–11 42.1% — 1,568 0 1
21 1990 13–16 44.8% #93 1,592 0 0 1996 13–17 43.3% — 1,618 0 1
22 1991 33–22 60.0% #50 1,814 0 0 1997 18–13 58.1% — 1,651 0 2
23 1992 50–22 69.4% #13 1,823 0 2 1998 9–11 45.0% — 1,712 0 2
24 1993 37–23 61.7% #23 1,843 0 2 1999 13–26 33.3% — 1,601 0 2
25 1994 36–23 61.0% #30 1,820 0 3 2000 5–10 33.3% — 1,550 0 2
26 1995 30–28 51.7% #26 1,812 0 3 2001 1–2 33.3% — 1,530 0 2
27 1996 33–25 56.9% #20 1,790 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1997 5–6 45.5% #258 1,727 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 1998 10–11 47.6% #178 1,703 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 1999 1–4 20.0% #303 1,633 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2000 0–1 0.0% #409 1,572 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2001 0–1 0.0% #513 1,557 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2002 1–1 50.0% #445 1,570 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2005 0–1 0.0% #778 1,551 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age MaliVai Washington Jan Kroslak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1990 9 7 16 56.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1996 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1997 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 12 4 16 75.0%
23 1992 30 10 40 75.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
24 1993 21 10 31 67.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 1999 9 10 19 47.4% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
25 1994 22 12 34 64.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1995 14 14 28 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1996 17 14 31 54.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 145 105 250 58.0% 41 31 72 56.9% 26 21 47 55.3% 40 35 75 53.3% — 35 40 75 46.7% 6 19 25 24.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 22 22 44 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age MaliVai Washington Jan Kroslak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1988 1494 109.6 — — — — +29 — — 40.0% -0.10 0–2 0–2 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1481 112.4 — — — — +34 — — 38.1% -0.38 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.40 1995 1569 121.0 — — — — +62 -74 — 40.0% -0.54 5–2 (71%) 2–5 (29%) 102.8 +0.61
21 1990 1593 133.5 — — — — +7 -20 -36 45.8% -0.07 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 -0.62 1996 1618 128.6 — — — — +14 — +9 43.2% -0.57 5–3 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 101.5 +0.45
22 1991 1814 149.9 +3.34 +1.58 1.116 51.9% -40 -196 -141 58.6% +0.89 9–9 (50%) 12–13 (48%) 103.6 -2.51 1997 1652 123.1 — — — — +54 -152 — 50.6% -0.03 8–2 (80%) 6–6 (50%) 105.5 +1.83
23 1992 1823 146.2 +3.09 +1.20 1.125 52.1% +3 -76 -136 66.9% +0.95 8–11 (42%) 14–13 (52%) 95.9 +2.83 1998 1713 142.4 — — — — +31 -206 — 44.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 -2.07
24 1993 1843 149.9 +3.25 +1.45 1.130 51.9% +46 -112 -145 58.2% +0.56 9–5 (64%) 12–10 (55%) 101.5 +0.49 1999 1601 119.9 — — — — +82 -174 -57 37.4% -1.08 5–5 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 104.3 +0.88
25 1994 1821 142.8 +2.40 +1.54 1.112 51.7% +52 -125 -148 54.4% +0.42 17–10 (63%) 11–16 (41%) 95.1 +0.19 2000 1550 107.6 — — — — +46 -123 — 36.1% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.3 +1.07
26 1995 1812 150.8 +3.06 +1.59 1.100 51.6% +24 -120 -178 52.5% +0.35 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) 95.2 -0.98 2001 1530 107.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.50 — 0–1 — +0.31
27 1996 1790 137.7 +0.19 +0.36 0.987 49.6% -32 -120 +16 56.6% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 12–12 (50%) 102.7 +1.58 2002 1494 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 1727 115.6 +0.15 -1.35 0.936 49.0% 0 — — 45.2% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 97.9 +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 1703 129.1 -0.58 +0.44 0.982 49.8% -2 — — 51.1% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1634 105.8 +0.31 +0.19 1.134 52.1% +24 — — 28.6% -1.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1572 91.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1557 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1571 107.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2005 1551 98.5 -0.21 +0.89 0.617 44.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1913 147.8 +2.45 +1.21 1.088 51.4% +10 -112 -107 55.4% +0.46 65–62 (51%) 76–89 (46%) 95.6 +0.57 — 1753 128.2 — — — — +49 -155 -20 42.2% -0.60 26–17 (60%) 29–28 (51%) 106.4 +1.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.