H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
MaliVai Washington vs Jim Grabb H2H: 0-1
Jim Grabb holds a 1–0 lead over MaliVai Washington in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1992 Paris Masters third round 4-6 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1992* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Jim Grabb | 4-6 6-4 6-0 | MaliVai Washington | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaliVai Washington | #1,484 | #11 | 2,016 | 1,912 | 249 | 191 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | MaliVai Washington | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #329 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #93 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #50 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #30 | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #26 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #20 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #258 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #178 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #303 | 1,622 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #409 | 1,562 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #513 | 1,548 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #445 | 1,562 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #778 | 1,543 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |