H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
MaliVai Washington vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 1-2
Mark Woodforde holds a 2–1 lead over MaliVai Washington in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, MaliVai Washington won the 1998 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1998* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | MaliVai Washington | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1998* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 7-5 7-5 | MaliVai Washington | Match data |
| Feb 27, 1993* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | MaliVai Washington | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaliVai Washington | #1,484 | #11 | 2,016 | 1,912 | 249 | 191 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | MaliVai Washington | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #329 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #93 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #50 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1993 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #30 | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1995 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #26 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1996 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #20 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1997 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #258 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #178 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #303 | 1,622 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #409 | 1,562 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #513 | 1,548 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #445 | 1,562 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #778 | 1,543 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |