H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mansour Bahrami vs Danie Visser H2H: 1-0
Mansour Bahrami holds a 1–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mansour Bahrami leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mansour Bahrami won the 1985 Nancy third round 6-7 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IRI
Age 70
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1985* | Nancy | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mansour Bahrami | 6-7 6-2 6-3 | Danie Visser | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mansour Bahrami | #1,159 | #192 | 55 | 1,564 | 22 | 46 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mansour Bahrami | Danie Visser | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #294 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #504 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #378 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1986 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #250 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #196 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1988 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #332 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1990 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #944 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |