H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mansour Bahrami vs Mel Purcell H2H: 0-2
Mel Purcell holds a 2–0 lead over Mansour Bahrami in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mel Purcell leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mel Purcell won the 1982 Paris Indoor third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IRI
Age 70
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1982* | Paris Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mel Purcell | 6-4 6-1 | Mansour Bahrami | Match data |
| May 29, 1981* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Mel Purcell | 6-1 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Mansour Bahrami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mansour Bahrami | #1,159 | #192 | 55 | 1,564 | 22 | 46 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mel Purcell | #673 | #21 | 21 | 1,991 | 190 | 164 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mansour Bahrami | Mel Purcell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #27 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #294 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #28 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #28 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #67 | 1,702 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1983 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #504 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,537 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #378 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1986 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #250 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #196 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1988 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #332 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1990 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #944 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |