H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Manuel Santana vs Graham Stilwell H2H: 1-1
Manuel Santana and Graham Stilwell are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Graham Stilwell leads 1–0 on clay, while Manuel Santana leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Graham Stilwell won the 1969 Rome third round 6-3 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 1969* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Graham Stilwell | 6-3 6-2 7-5 | Manuel Santana | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1968* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Manuel Santana | 5-7 10-8 6-0 6-4 | Graham Stilwell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel Santana | #374 | #145 | 0 | 1,994 | 113 | 50 | 69.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Graham Stilwell | #62 | #62 | 0 | 1,734 | 97 | 181 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Manuel Santana | Graham Stilwell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 15–28 | 34.9% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–32 | 22.0% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 10–27 | 27.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 15–33 | 31.2% | #109 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #128 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #83 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1968 | 38–11 | 77.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1969 | 25–6 | 80.6% | — | 1,909 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1970 | 25–8 | 75.8% | — | 1,992 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1971 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,875 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1974 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #188 | 1,743 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,699 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,653 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #365 | 1,640 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #374 | 1,641 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |