H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Marat Safin vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 2-3

Feliciano Lopez holds a 3–2 lead over Marat Safin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Feliciano Lopez leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Marat Safin won the 2008 Wimbledon quarterfinal 3-6 7-5 7-6(1) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marat Safin
RUS Age 46 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 3, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Marat Safin #75 3-6 7-5 7-6(1) 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #35 Match data
Mar 22, 2007* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Feliciano Lopez #84 7-5 7-6(2) Marat Safin #27 Match data
Jun 26, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Feliciano Lopez #33 6-4 7-6(4) 6-3 Marat Safin #5 Match data
Oct 21, 2004* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Marat Safin #9 7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #27 Match data
Sep 27, 2002* Hong Kong ATP 250 R16 Hard Feliciano Lopez #71 7-6(2) 7-5 Marat Safin #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marat Safin #61 #1 4,300 2,100 395 247 61.5% 2 5 0 0 8 15
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marat Safin Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #203 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 16–16 50.0% #49 1,664 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 1999 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 1 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 2000 69–23 75.0% #2 2,060 1 8 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 2001 43–23 65.2% #11 1,923 1 10 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2002 48–23 67.6% #3 1,892 1 11 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2003 12–13 48.0% #77 1,727 1 11 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2004 50–21 70.4% #4 1,987 1 14 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2005 25–11 69.4% #12 1,948 2 15 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2006 33–23 58.9% #26 1,879 2 15 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2007 21–19 52.5% #56 1,756 2 15 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2008 24–23 51.1% #29 1,780 2 15 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2009 18–22 45.0% #61 1,777 2 15 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7