H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marat Safin vs George Bastl H2H: 4-0
Marat Safin holds a 4–0 lead over George Bastl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marat Safin leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marat Safin won the 2007 Los Angeles fourth round 6-2 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 51
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2007* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marat Safin | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | George Bastl | Match data |
| Nov 16, 2000* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Marat Safin | 7-5 6-4 | George Bastl | Match data |
| Sep 16, 2000* | Tashkent | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Marat Safin | 6-2 6-2 | George Bastl | Match data |
| May 31, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Marat Safin | 6-7(4) 6-1 6-3 6-2 | George Bastl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marat Safin | #61 | #1 | 4,300 | 2,100 | 395 | 247 | 61.5% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 15 |
| George Bastl | #953 | #71 | 569 | 1,657 | 47 | 85 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marat Safin | George Bastl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 69–23 | 75.0% | #2 | 2,060 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 1 | 10 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #3 | 1,892 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2003 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #77 | 1,727 | 1 | 11 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #4 | 1,987 | 1 | 14 | 1999 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,948 | 2 | 15 | 2000 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #105 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #26 | 1,879 | 2 | 15 | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #56 | 1,756 | 2 | 15 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #29 | 1,780 | 2 | 15 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,777 | 2 | 15 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #173 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #233 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |