H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marat Safin vs Greg Rusedski H2H: 3-3

Marat Safin and Greg Rusedski are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Marat Safin leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Marat Safin won the 2006 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marat Safin
RUS Age 46 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Marat Safin #87 6-4 6-4 6-4 Greg Rusedski #40 Match data
Aug 7, 2002* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Greg Rusedski #38 7-6(7) 6-2 Marat Safin #2 Match data
Feb 3, 2001* Milan ATP 250 QF Carpet Greg Rusedski #52 6-0 7-6(5) Marat Safin #1 Match data
Nov 4, 2000* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Greg Rusedski #89 7-6(2) 6-4 Marat Safin #2 Match data
Jun 16, 2000* Queen's Club ATP 250 R16 Grass Marat Safin #8 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 6-4 Greg Rusedski #20 Match data
Aug 29, 1999* Boston ATP 250 F Hard Marat Safin #33 6-4 7-6(11) Greg Rusedski #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marat Safin #61 #1 4,300 2,100 395 247 61.5% 2 5 0 0 8 15
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marat Safin Greg Rusedski
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #203 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 16–16 50.0% #49 1,664 0 0 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0
19 1999 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 1 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1
20 2000 69–23 75.0% #2 2,060 1 8 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1
21 2001 43–23 65.2% #11 1,923 1 10 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2
22 2002 48–23 67.6% #3 1,892 1 11 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3
23 2003 12–13 48.0% #77 1,727 1 11 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5
24 2004 50–21 70.4% #4 1,987 1 14 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7
25 2005 25–11 69.4% #12 1,948 2 15 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9
26 2006 33–23 58.9% #26 1,879 2 15 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9
27 2007 21–19 52.5% #56 1,756 2 15 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10
28 2008 24–23 51.1% #29 1,780 2 15 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12
29 2009 18–22 45.0% #61 1,777 2 15 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13
30 — — — — — — — 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15