H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Marat Safin vs Gustavo Kuerten H2H: 3-4

Gustavo Kuerten holds a 4–3 lead over Marat Safin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Gustavo Kuerten leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Gustavo Kuerten won the 2002 Lyon quarterfinal 7-5 4-6 7-6(3).

RUS Age 46 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 2002* Lyon ATP 250 QF Carpet Gustavo Kuerten #40 7-5 4-6 7-6(3) Marat Safin #4 Match data
Aug 30, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Gustavo Kuerten #46 6-4 6-4 7-5 Marat Safin #2 Match data
Aug 14, 2000 Indianapolis ATP 250 F Hard Gustavo Kuerten #2 3-6 7-6(2) 7-6(2) Marat Safin #7 Match data
May 22, 2000* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 F Clay Gustavo Kuerten #5 6-4 5-7 6-4 5-7 7-6(3) Marat Safin #12 Match data
Nov 4, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Marat Safin #34 7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(4) Gustavo Kuerten #5 Match data
Jan 22, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Marat Safin #47 6-3 5-7 4-6 6-3 6-4 Gustavo Kuerten #23 Match data
May 29, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Marat Safin #116 3-6 7-6(5) 3-6 6-1 6-4 Gustavo Kuerten #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marat Safin #61 #1 4,300 2,100 395 247 61.5% 2 5 0 0 8 15
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,140 336 182 64.9% 3 5 1 0 11 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marat Safin Gustavo Kuerten
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #203 1,490 0 0
18 1998 16–16 50.0% #49 1,664 0 0
19 1999 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 1 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0
20 2000 69–23 75.0% #2 2,060 1 8 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,779 1 1
21 2001 43–23 65.2% #11 1,923 1 10 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3
22 2002 48–23 67.6% #3 1,892 1 11 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,860 1 5
23 2003 12–13 48.0% #77 1,727 1 11 2000 59–18 76.6% #1 2,012 2 10
24 2004 50–21 70.4% #4 1,987 1 14 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,915 3 16
25 2005 25–11 69.4% #12 1,948 2 15 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,874 3 17
26 2006 33–23 58.9% #26 1,879 2 15 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,854 3 19
27 2007 21–19 52.5% #56 1,756 2 15 2004 23–12 65.7% #40 1,834 3 20
28 2008 24–23 51.1% #29 1,780 2 15 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,714 3 20
29 2009 18–22 45.0% #61 1,777 2 15 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,689 3 20
30 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,601 3 20
31 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,560 3 20