H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marat Safin vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-2
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 2–1 lead over Marat Safin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Marat Safin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2007 Los Angeles quarterfinal 4-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2007* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | Marat Safin | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2005* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Marat Safin | 6-0 7-5 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2003* | Sydney | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | (w/o) | Marat Safin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marat Safin | #61 | #1 | 4,300 | 2,100 | 395 | 247 | 61.5% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 15 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marat Safin | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 69–23 | 75.0% | #2 | 2,060 | 1 | 8 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 1 | 10 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #3 | 1,892 | 1 | 11 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #77 | 1,727 | 1 | 11 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #4 | 1,987 | 1 | 14 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,948 | 2 | 15 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #26 | 1,879 | 2 | 15 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #56 | 1,756 | 2 | 15 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #29 | 1,780 | 2 | 15 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,777 | 2 | 15 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |