H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marat Safin vs Jan Hernych H2H: 3-0
Marat Safin holds a 3–0 lead over Jan Hernych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marat Safin leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marat Safin won the 2007 Washington third round 6-2 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2007* | Washington | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Marat Safin | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2005* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marat Safin | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2004* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marat Safin | 6-4 7-6(3) | Jan Hernych | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marat Safin | #61 | #1 | 4,300 | 2,100 | 395 | 247 | 61.5% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 15 |
| Jan Hernych | #1,606 | #59 | 1,157 | 1,780 | 79 | 115 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marat Safin | Jan Hernych | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 69–23 | 75.0% | #2 | 2,060 | 1 | 8 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #3 | 1,892 | 1 | 11 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #77 | 1,727 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #4 | 1,987 | 1 | 14 | 2004 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,948 | 2 | 15 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #74 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #26 | 1,879 | 2 | 15 | 2006 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #56 | 1,756 | 2 | 15 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #156 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #29 | 1,780 | 2 | 15 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,777 | 2 | 15 | 2009 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #113 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #168 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #193 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |