H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marat Safin vs Julien Boutter H2H: 2-1
Marat Safin holds a 2–1 lead over Julien Boutter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Marat Safin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marat Safin won the 2001 Dubai fourth round 7-5 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2001* | Dubai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marat Safin | 7-5 7-6(5) | Julien Boutter | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2000* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Marat Safin | 7-5 5-7 6-3 | Julien Boutter | Match data |
| Feb 4, 1999* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Julien Boutter | 6-4 7-6(2) | Marat Safin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marat Safin | #61 | #1 | 4,300 | 2,100 | 395 | 247 | 61.5% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 15 |
| Julien Boutter | #1,092 | #46 | 790 | 1,817 | 62 | 84 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marat Safin | Julien Boutter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 69–23 | 75.0% | #2 | 2,060 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #3 | 1,892 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2003 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #77 | 1,727 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #4 | 1,987 | 1 | 14 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #276 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,948 | 2 | 15 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #26 | 1,879 | 2 | 15 | 2000 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #56 | 1,756 | 2 | 15 | 2001 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #29 | 1,780 | 2 | 15 | 2002 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,777 | 2 | 15 | 2003 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #110 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #597 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |