H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marat Safin vs Magnus Larsson H2H: 1-1
Marat Safin and Magnus Larsson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marat Safin leads 1–0 on clay, while Magnus Larsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 2001 Hong Kong fourth round 6-2 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2001* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Magnus Larsson | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Marat Safin | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1998* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Marat Safin | 6-3 6-2 | Magnus Larsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marat Safin | #61 | #1 | 4,300 | 2,100 | 395 | 247 | 61.5% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 15 |
| Magnus Larsson | #1,422 | #10 | 2,222 | 2,040 | 293 | 217 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marat Safin | Magnus Larsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 69–23 | 75.0% | #2 | 2,060 | 1 | 8 | 1990 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #56 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 1 | 10 | 1991 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2002 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #3 | 1,892 | 1 | 11 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,802 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2003 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #77 | 1,727 | 1 | 11 | 1993 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #39 | 1,820 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2004 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #4 | 1,987 | 1 | 14 | 1994 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #19 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2005 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,948 | 2 | 15 | 1995 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2006 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #26 | 1,879 | 2 | 15 | 1996 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #46 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2007 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #56 | 1,756 | 2 | 15 | 1997 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #25 | 1,891 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #29 | 1,780 | 2 | 15 | 1998 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2009 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,777 | 2 | 15 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #95 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #75 | 1,770 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,728 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #507 | 1,689 | 0 | 7 |