H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC

Marat Safin vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 3-0

Marat Safin holds a 3–0 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marat Safin leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marat Safin won the 2006 Metz third round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marat Safin
RUS Age 46 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 5, 2006* Metz ATP 250 R32 Hard Marat Safin #63 6-1 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #24 Match data
Sep 19, 2004* Beijing ATP 250 F Hard Marat Safin #13 7-6(4) 7-5 Mikhail Youzhny #35 Match data
Jan 20, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Marat Safin #11 6-4 6-4 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marat Safin #61 #1 4,300 2,100 395 247 61.5% 2 5 0 0 8 15
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marat Safin Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #203 1,490 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 1998 16–16 50.0% #49 1,664 0 0 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 1999 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 1 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2000 69–23 75.0% #2 2,060 1 8 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 2001 43–23 65.2% #11 1,923 1 10 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2002 48–23 67.6% #3 1,892 1 11 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2003 12–13 48.0% #77 1,727 1 11 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2004 50–21 70.4% #4 1,987 1 14 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2005 25–11 69.4% #12 1,948 2 15 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2006 33–23 58.9% #26 1,879 2 15 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2007 21–19 52.5% #56 1,756 2 15 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2008 24–23 51.1% #29 1,780 2 15 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2009 18–22 45.0% #61 1,777 2 15 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10