H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marat Safin vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 3-1
Marat Safin holds a 3–1 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marat Safin leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Mahut won the 2007 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-3 4-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2007* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Mahut | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | Marat Safin | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2006* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Marat Safin | 6-1 7-6(5) | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2006* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marat Safin | 6-3 6-4 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| Aug 3, 2006* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marat Safin | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marat Safin | #61 | #1 | 4,300 | 2,100 | 395 | 247 | 61.5% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 15 |
| Nicolas Mahut | #1,433 | #37 | 1,122 | 1,926 | 179 | 224 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marat Safin | Nicolas Mahut | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 69–23 | 75.0% | #2 | 2,060 | 1 | 8 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 1 | 10 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #3 | 1,892 | 1 | 11 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #77 | 1,727 | 1 | 11 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #4 | 1,987 | 1 | 14 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,948 | 2 | 15 | 2007 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #26 | 1,879 | 2 | 15 | 2008 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #56 | 1,756 | 2 | 15 | 2009 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #29 | 1,780 | 2 | 15 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #132 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,777 | 2 | 15 | 2011 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #108 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 17–7 | 70.8% | #50 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #71 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #103 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #190 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #194 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |