H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marat Safin vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 4-4

Marat Safin and Nikolay Davydenko are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Marat Safin leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Nikolay Davydenko leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Marat Safin won the 2009 Moscow third round 4-6 6-4 6-2.

RUS Age 46 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 22, 2009* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Hard Marat Safin #76 4-6 6-4 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Oct 11, 2008* Moscow ATP 250 QF Hard Marat Safin #40 7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #5 Match data
May 29, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 7-6(4) 6-2 6-2 Marat Safin #73 Match data
May 10, 2007* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 7-6(4) 7-5 Marat Safin #26 Match data
Oct 15, 2006* Moscow ATP 250 F Carpet Nikolay Davydenko #5 6-4 5-7 6-4 Marat Safin #65 Match data
May 5, 2006* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #6 4-6 6-1 6-2 Marat Safin #49 Match data
Mar 9, 2006* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Marat Safin #53 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #5 Match data
Mar 2, 2006* Dubai ATP 250 R32 Hard Marat Safin #53 4-6 6-2 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marat Safin #61 #1 4,300 2,100 395 247 61.5% 2 5 0 0 8 15
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marat Safin Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #203 1,490 0 0
18 1998 16–16 50.0% #49 1,664 0 0
19 1999 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 1 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2000 69–23 75.0% #2 2,060 1 8 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2001 43–23 65.2% #11 1,923 1 10 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2002 48–23 67.6% #3 1,892 1 11 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2003 12–13 48.0% #77 1,727 1 11 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2004 50–21 70.4% #4 1,987 1 14 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2005 25–11 69.4% #12 1,948 2 15 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2006 33–23 58.9% #26 1,879 2 15 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2007 21–19 52.5% #56 1,756 2 15 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2008 24–23 51.1% #29 1,780 2 15 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2009 18–22 45.0% #61 1,777 2 15 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21