H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Marat Safin vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 2-0
Marat Safin holds a 2–0 lead over Sebastien Lareau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marat Safin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marat Safin won the 2000 Copenhagen third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2000* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marat Safin | 6-4 7-6(5) | Sebastien Lareau | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1999* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marat Safin | 7-5 7-6(2) | Sebastien Lareau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marat Safin | #61 | #1 | 4,300 | 2,100 | 395 | 247 | 61.5% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 15 |
| Sebastien Lareau | #1,018 | #76 | 622 | 1,719 | 82 | 120 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marat Safin | Sebastien Lareau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 69–23 | 75.0% | #2 | 2,060 | 1 | 8 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 1 | 10 | 1994 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #119 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #3 | 1,892 | 1 | 11 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #77 | 1,727 | 1 | 11 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #105 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #4 | 1,987 | 1 | 14 | 1997 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #187 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,948 | 2 | 15 | 1998 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #26 | 1,879 | 2 | 15 | 1999 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #56 | 1,756 | 2 | 15 | 2000 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #124 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #29 | 1,780 | 2 | 15 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #229 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,777 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |