H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Marat Safin vs Tim Henman H2H: 3-3

Marat Safin and Tim Henman are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Marat Safin leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 Miami Masters first round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marat Safin
RUS Age 46 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 21, 2006* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Tim Henman #56 6-3 6-3 Marat Safin #47 Match data
Nov 15, 2004 Masters Cup ATP Finals RR Hard Marat Safin #4 6-2 7-6(2) Tim Henman #7 Match data
Mar 16, 2002* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tim Henman #11 7-6(3) 6-4 Marat Safin #8 Match data
Aug 14, 2000 Indianapolis ATP 250 SF Hard Marat Safin #7 7-5 6-4 Tim Henman #11 Match data
Oct 14, 1999* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Marat Safin #35 6-4 2-6 6-3 Tim Henman #9 Match data
Feb 20, 1999* Rotterdam ATP 250 SF Carpet Tim Henman #7 7-6(7) 7-6(0) Marat Safin #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marat Safin #61 #1 4,300 2,100 395 247 61.5% 2 5 0 0 8 15
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marat Safin Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #203 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 16–16 50.0% #49 1,664 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1999 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 1 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 2000 69–23 75.0% #2 2,060 1 8 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 2001 43–23 65.2% #11 1,923 1 10 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 2002 48–23 67.6% #3 1,892 1 11 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2003 12–13 48.0% #77 1,727 1 11 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2004 50–21 70.4% #4 1,987 1 14 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 2005 25–11 69.4% #12 1,948 2 15 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2006 33–23 58.9% #26 1,879 2 15 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2007 21–19 52.5% #56 1,756 2 15 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2008 24–23 51.1% #29 1,780 2 15 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2009 18–22 45.0% #61 1,777 2 15 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11