H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marat Safin vs Tommy Haas H2H: 2-4

Tommy Haas holds a 4–2 lead over Marat Safin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2009 Los Angeles quarterfinal 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marat Safin
RUS Age 46 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 1, 2009* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Tommy Haas #22 7-6(3) 6-2 Marat Safin #55 Match data
Nov 5, 2006* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Tommy Haas #13 7-6(1) 3-6 6-3 Marat Safin #37 Match data
Sep 6, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Tommy Haas #16 4-6 6-3 2-6 6-2 7-6(5) Marat Safin #104 Match data
Jan 27, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Marat Safin #11 6-7(5) 7-6(4) 3-6 6-0 6-2 Tommy Haas #9 Match data
Jun 4, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Marat Safin #12 7-6(2) 6-3 6-3 Tommy Haas #21 Match data
Apr 21, 1999* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tommy Haas #20 6-4 6-2 Marat Safin #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marat Safin #61 #1 4,300 2,100 395 247 61.5% 2 5 0 0 8 15
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marat Safin Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #203 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 16–16 50.0% #49 1,664 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 1999 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 1 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2000 69–23 75.0% #2 2,060 1 8 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2001 43–23 65.2% #11 1,923 1 10 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2002 48–23 67.6% #3 1,892 1 11 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2003 12–13 48.0% #77 1,727 1 11 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2004 50–21 70.4% #4 1,987 1 14 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2005 25–11 69.4% #12 1,948 2 15 — — — — — — —
26 2006 33–23 58.9% #26 1,879 2 15 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2007 21–19 52.5% #56 1,756 2 15 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2008 24–23 51.1% #29 1,780 2 15 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2009 18–22 45.0% #61 1,777 2 15 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15