H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marat Safin vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 2-1
Marat Safin holds a 2–1 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Marat Safin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marat Safin won the 2004 Monte Carlo Masters fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2004* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Marat Safin | 6-4 6-2 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2002* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Marat Safin | 6-3 4-6 7-6(10) | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1998* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Wayne Arthurs | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Marat Safin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marat Safin | #61 | #1 | 4,300 | 2,100 | 395 | 247 | 61.5% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 15 |
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marat Safin | Wayne Arthurs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 69–23 | 75.0% | #2 | 2,060 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #3 | 1,892 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2003 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #77 | 1,727 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #4 | 1,987 | 1 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2005 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,948 | 2 | 15 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #26 | 1,879 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #56 | 1,756 | 2 | 15 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #29 | 1,780 | 2 | 15 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,777 | 2 | 15 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |