H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Marc Gicquel vs Danai Udomchoke

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Marc Gicquel vs Danai Udomchoke.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marc Gicquel
FRA Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Danai Udomchoke
THA Age 45 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danai Udomchoke #161 6-2 6-1 Marc Gicquel #160 Match data Jun 20, 2005 Q1 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marc Gicquel #857 #37 1,448 1,787 92 113 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Danai Udomchoke #1,207 #77 646 1,631 18 52 25.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marc Gicquel Danai Udomchoke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2001 2–1 66.7% #283 1,509 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #211 1,489 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #162 1,437 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2004 0–3 0.0% #204 1,488 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2005 2–4 33.3% #121 1,562 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2006 6–12 33.3% #104 1,563 0 0
25 2002 1–1 50.0% #223 1,500 0 0 2007 7–19 26.9% #154 1,498 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2008 0–2 0.0% #152 1,525 0 0
27 2004 1–2 33.3% #170 1,520 0 0 2009 0–5 0.0% #162 1,501 0 0
28 2005 3–2 60.0% #123 1,544 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #457 1,480 0 0
29 2006 17–12 58.6% #50 1,750 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #210 1,507 0 0
30 2007 21–25 45.7% #70 1,711 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #149 1,523 0 0
31 2008 21–24 46.7% #54 1,697 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2009 21–25 45.7% #58 1,717 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2010 5–12 29.4% #151 1,642 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2012 0–1 0.0% #152 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2013 0–5 0.0% #120 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 2014 2–1 66.7% #342 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marc Gicquel Danai Udomchoke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
25 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 11 15 26.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 9 6 15 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 5 12 17 29.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 59 102 42.2% 26 33 59 44.1% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 6 18 66.7% — 13 37 50 26.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marc Gicquel Danai Udomchoke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 3/3 3.3 2.3 60.2% 71.8% 45.1% 57.4% 41.1% 61.0% 36.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 2.0 2.0 56.6% 50.0% 39.1% 58.3% 50.0% 45.3% 34.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/3 1.3 3.7 62.5% 59.7% 47.9% 49.9% 31.5% 54.9% 37.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/6 2.7 4.3 58.4% 65.1% 50.3% 58.0% 48.6% 58.3% 36.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 18/18 4.3 3.5 63.0% 69.5% 42.7% 62.0% 29.5% 60.0% 35.9%
25 2002 2/2 9.0 1.5 52.9% 72.9% 53.5% 87.5% 50.0% 63.1% 24.8% 2007 26/26 3.3 3.8 59.9% 67.8% 47.9% 49.2% 39.3% 59.6% 35.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 5.5 7.0 66.4% 56.0% 37.9% 49.4% 45.0% 49.9% 34.3%
27 2004 3/3 2.0 1.7 60.1% 62.3% 54.0% 15.7% 35.2% 59.0% 36.3% 2009 5/5 3.4 3.0 61.2% 67.1% 42.4% 62.1% 40.0% 57.5% 30.2%
28 2005 5/5 4.8 1.8 63.1% 72.8% 48.4% 52.4% 44.6% 64.0% 41.1% 2010 1/1 0.0 2.0 65.4% 64.7% 38.9% 57.1% 0.0% 55.8% 27.5%
29 2006 29/29 6.8 1.6 54.9% 75.8% 50.6% 66.8% 37.8% 64.1% 36.7% 2011 2/2 2.0 3.0 64.4% 64.0% 45.6% 52.3% 56.3% 57.7% 40.5%
30 2007 46/46 6.0 1.9 57.9% 74.2% 50.2% 59.6% 38.2% 63.8% 34.8% 2012 2/2 4.5 3.5 63.3% 60.0% 44.8% 43.4% 47.7% 54.5% 33.5%
31 2008 45/45 6.8 2.2 58.5% 73.2% 49.1% 62.8% 43.5% 63.2% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 46/46 5.8 2.8 55.7% 73.1% 51.9% 65.3% 39.3% 63.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 17/17 5.4 2.7 54.0% 69.5% 48.9% 50.4% 46.6% 59.4% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 3/3 4.3 4.3 53.8% 71.8% 52.6% 40.3% 27.8% 62.6% 28.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1/1 4.0 2.0 61.4% 72.5% 50.0% 42.9% 40.0% 63.9% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 5/5 3.2 3.8 53.0% 61.9% 43.9% 58.1% 39.2% 52.9% 27.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 3/3 7.7 1.0 64.8% 77.5% 53.7% 53.6% 41.9% 69.0% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 205/205 6.0 2.3 56.8% 73.0% 50.3% 60.8% 40.4% 63.1% 35.8% — 69/70 3.4 3.6 61.2% 66.8% 45.5% 54.8% 37.8% 58.5% 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marc Gicquel Danai Udomchoke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1511 104.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1509 104.7 -0.29 -0.14 0.936 49.8% +18 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 — — +0.29
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1489 101.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.07
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1438 91.4 +0.50 -1.38 0.622 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1489 108.9 -1.95 -0.64 0.840 46.7% +25 — — 12.5% -1.63 0–1 — — -0.11
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1563 118.8 -1.66 -0.22 0.869 47.6% -47 — — 36.8% -0.89 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.5 -0.36
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1564 116.2 -2.69 -0.23 0.899 48.1% +6 — +5 31.7% -1.10 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.8 -0.02
25 2002 1501 101.9 +0.60 -0.57 0.672 47.2% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 0–1 — +0.17 2007 1499 113.6 -3.16 -1.20 0.876 47.4% +15 -71 +50 37.5% -0.94 2–8 (20%) 6–4 (60%) 96.8 +0.93
26 2003 1471 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1525 106.5 -3.90 -1.95 0.684 42.5% — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–2 1–0 — +0.02
27 2004 1520 105.8 -1.54 -0.60 0.885 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.55 2009 1501 108.8 -2.60 -1.67 0.711 44.3% +41 — — 0.0% -2.64 — 0–2 — +0.11
28 2005 1544 107.2 +1.50 +0.12 1.141 52.0% +14 — — 54.5% +0.27 1–0 — — 0.00 2010 1480 100.3 -0.48 +0.05 0.621 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
29 2006 1750 135.4 +1.93 -0.94 1.024 50.4% -8 -166 — 58.9% +0.30 5–4 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 102.6 +0.08 2011 1508 106.0 -0.56 -1.62 0.959 49.1% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
30 2007 1711 135.5 +0.72 -1.60 0.962 49.2% +21 -89 -185 45.9% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 9–6 (60%) 104.0 -0.22 2012 1523 106.3 +0.44 -2.27 0.738 45.0% — — — 28.6% -1.71 0–1 1–0 — -0.04
31 2008 1697 134.8 +0.16 -0.18 0.988 49.9% -51 -11 +5 45.9% -0.16 4–8 (33%) 10–9 (53%) 96.8 +0.69 2013 1519 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1718 138.5 +0.34 +0.15 1.022 50.3% -16 -6 -26 49.1% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 96.3 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1643 123.6 -2.04 -2.07 0.852 47.8% +67 -11 -42 35.0% -0.90 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.86 2015 1501 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1576 104.0 -0.75 -0.94 0.755 45.2% — — — 10.0% -1.70 — 0–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1592 108.8 +2.93 -4.09 1.168 52.6% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 1621 111.9 -3.55 -2.25 0.591 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.08 — 0–2 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1640 117.0 +2.04 +0.21 1.292 53.2% +39 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1787 131.8 +0.34 -0.77 0.970 49.5% -4 -57 -51 46.1% -0.22 22–30 (42%) 40–38 (51%) 99.1 +0.38 — 1631 112.5 -2.44 -0.87 0.852 47.1% +9 -71 +31 32.2% -1.18 8–16 (33%) 12–13 (48%) 96.6 +1.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.