H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Marc Gicquel vs Donald Young H2H: 1-0

Marc Gicquel holds a 1–0 lead over Donald Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marc Gicquel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Gicquel won the 2008 Los Angeles Open round of 16 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marc Gicquel
FRA Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Donald Young
USA Age 37 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donald Young #157 6-2 6-3 Marc Gicquel #119 Match data Aug 27, 2013* Q2 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard
Marc Gicquel #49 6-3 6-3 Donald Young #100 Match data Aug 8, 2008* R16 Los Angeles Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marc Gicquel #857 #37 1,448 1,787 92 113 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Donald Young #1,350 #38 1,039 1,932 125 188 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marc Gicquel Donald Young
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 0–7 0.0% #553 1,402 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 0–3 0.0% #494 1,380 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 3–3 50.0% #100 1,423 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 8–20 28.6% #138 1,485 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 0–4 0.0% #194 1,522 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2010 3–6 33.3% #127 1,555 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2011 19–17 52.8% #39 1,800 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2012 5–24 17.2% #190 1,587 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2013 2–3 40.0% #96 1,696 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2014 18–21 46.2% #57 1,759 0 0
25 2002 1–1 50.0% #223 1,500 0 0 2015 21–22 48.8% #48 1,828 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2016 18–21 46.2% #88 1,800 0 0
27 2004 1–2 33.3% #170 1,520 0 0 2017 25–22 53.2% #61 1,786 0 0
28 2005 3–2 60.0% #123 1,544 0 0 2018 3–12 20.0% #248 1,727 0 0
29 2006 17–12 58.6% #50 1,750 0 0 2019 0–2 0.0% #230 1,648 0 0
30 2007 21–25 45.7% #70 1,711 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2008 21–24 46.7% #54 1,697 0 0 2021 0–1 0.0% #411 1,604 0 0
32 2009 21–25 45.7% #58 1,717 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2010 5–12 29.4% #151 1,642 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2012 0–1 0.0% #152 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2013 0–5 0.0% #120 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 2014 2–1 66.7% #342 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marc Gicquel Donald Young
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 6 14 20 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 5 14 19 26.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 13 16 29 44.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 21 15 36 58.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 11 15 26 42.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 20 15 35 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2018 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 9 6 15 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 5 12 17 29.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 59 102 42.2% 26 33 59 44.1% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 6 18 66.7% — 103 139 242 42.6% 7 25 32 21.9% 15 24 39 38.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 205/205 of Marc Gicquel's and 310/313 of Donald Young's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marc Gicquel Donald Young
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 7/7 2.0 2.6 61.8% 55.4% 43.7% 41.0% 38.9% 50.9% 32.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 1.3 4.3 54.6% 47.1% 35.8% 15.7% 4.2% 41.9% 32.0%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/6 5.2 4.4 56.0% 75.2% 48.1% 63.4% 33.9% 63.1% 37.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 28/28 3.1 3.4 59.1% 66.0% 48.4% 61.2% 38.5% 58.9% 34.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 3.5 3.3 54.8% 66.6% 47.1% 54.6% 38.1% 56.1% 31.9%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 9/9 3.7 4.0 59.6% 67.5% 46.6% 53.3% 56.3% 59.1% 36.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 36/36 2.8 3.4 63.9% 67.3% 52.8% 54.0% 44.8% 61.9% 38.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 28/29 2.1 4.1 60.4% 63.8% 41.9% 52.3% 35.2% 54.9% 37.0%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 5/5 2.6 4.4 64.6% 62.3% 53.6% 60.7% 48.4% 57.6% 48.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 39/39 3.1 3.7 62.4% 69.1% 50.6% 52.6% 38.9% 62.2% 38.0%
25 2002 2/2 9.0 1.5 52.9% 72.9% 53.5% 87.5% 50.0% 63.1% 24.8% 2015 43/43 3.6 4.5 55.4% 69.5% 50.3% 49.7% 38.9% 61.1% 36.9%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 39/39 3.6 3.7 57.6% 70.7% 51.0% 60.9% 40.9% 62.7% 37.1%
27 2004 3/3 2.0 1.7 60.1% 62.3% 54.0% 15.7% 35.2% 59.0% 36.3% 2017 46/47 4.2 4.0 60.9% 69.1% 50.0% 58.3% 45.0% 61.5% 33.4%
28 2005 5/5 4.8 1.8 63.1% 72.8% 48.4% 52.4% 44.6% 64.0% 41.1% 2018 15/15 2.7 4.4 60.3% 63.1% 48.9% 51.9% 43.4% 57.0% 33.3%
29 2006 29/29 6.8 1.6 54.9% 75.8% 50.6% 66.8% 37.8% 64.1% 36.7% 2019 2/2 1.0 2.5 59.3% 54.4% 44.2% 50.0% 17.1% 50.5% 37.2%
30 2007 46/46 6.0 1.9 57.9% 74.2% 50.2% 59.6% 38.2% 63.8% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 45/45 6.8 2.2 58.5% 73.2% 49.1% 62.8% 43.5% 63.2% 36.4% 2021 1/1 4.0 6.0 58.9% 65.1% 36.7% 50.0% 50.0% 53.4% 29.4%
32 2009 46/46 5.8 2.8 55.7% 73.1% 51.9% 65.3% 39.3% 63.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 17/17 5.4 2.7 54.0% 69.5% 48.9% 50.4% 46.6% 59.4% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 3/3 4.3 4.3 53.8% 71.8% 52.6% 40.3% 27.8% 62.6% 28.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1/1 4.0 2.0 61.4% 72.5% 50.0% 42.9% 40.0% 63.9% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 5/5 3.2 3.8 53.0% 61.9% 43.9% 58.1% 39.2% 52.9% 27.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 3/3 7.7 1.0 64.8% 77.5% 53.7% 53.6% 41.9% 69.0% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 205/205 6.0 2.3 56.8% 73.0% 50.3% 60.8% 40.4% 63.1% 35.8% — 310/313 3.2 3.9 59.8% 67.4% 49.2% 54.7% 40.7% 60.0% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marc Gicquel Donald Young
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1483 94.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1402 94.5 -5.39 -2.99 0.671 41.9% +21 — — 0.0% -3.27 — 0–2 — +0.58
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1381 91.8 -3.44 -2.20 0.550 36.6% +7 — — 12.5% -4.00 — — — +0.11
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1424 114.0 -0.74 +1.71 1.007 49.9% +6 — — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.03
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1486 119.6 -3.47 -1.98 0.836 47.1% +9 -17 +42 33.8% -1.07 3–4 (43%) 2–8 (20%) 97.9 +0.92
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1522 111.1 -0.60 -1.54 0.727 44.6% +11 — — 18.2% -2.09 0–1 1–0 — -0.14
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1556 118.9 -1.42 -0.33 0.883 48.4% +27 — — 34.8% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — -0.09
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1801 137.2 -0.51 +1.10 1.019 50.0% +33 — -239 49.4% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 104.7 +2.05
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1588 122.1 -6.32 +0.15 0.820 45.9% +58 -147 -95 27.8% -1.51 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 92.3 +0.45
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1696 130.6 -1.46 +1.87 1.137 52.9% +51 — — 30.0% -0.20 — — — -0.08
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1760 144.1 -1.19 +1.54 1.003 50.0% -2 -165 -294 46.0% -0.18 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 +0.24
25 2002 1501 101.9 +0.60 -0.57 0.672 47.2% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 0–1 — +0.17 2015 1829 152.7 -2.57 +1.65 0.948 49.2% +46 -252 -393 47.7% -0.19 8–5 (62%) 5–2 (71%) 106.3 -0.51
26 2003 1471 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1801 143.0 -1.36 +0.89 0.994 50.0% +6 -187 -184 44.7% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 5–7 (42%) 98.9 +0.47
27 2004 1520 105.8 -1.54 -0.60 0.885 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.55 2017 1786 149.2 -1.67 -1.82 0.865 48.1% +15 -212 -63 47.2% -0.47 8–5 (62%) 12–4 (75%) 109.1 -0.96
28 2005 1544 107.2 +1.50 +0.12 1.141 52.0% +14 — — 54.5% +0.27 1–0 — — 0.00 2018 1727 131.1 -4.14 -0.47 0.774 45.1% +69 — — 22.2% -1.86 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 98.3 -1.41
29 2006 1750 135.4 +1.93 -0.94 1.024 50.4% -8 -166 — 58.9% +0.30 5–4 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 102.6 +0.08 2019 1649 106.1 -2.97 +1.63 0.752 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.14
30 2007 1711 135.5 +0.72 -1.60 0.962 49.2% +21 -89 -185 45.9% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 9–6 (60%) 104.0 -0.22 2020 1629 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1697 134.8 +0.16 -0.18 0.988 49.9% -51 -11 +5 45.9% -0.16 4–8 (33%) 10–9 (53%) 96.8 +0.69 2021 1604 96.3 -1.00 +0.69 0.631 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.13
32 2009 1718 138.5 +0.34 +0.15 1.022 50.3% -16 -6 -26 49.1% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 96.3 +0.21 2022 1574 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1643 123.6 -2.04 -2.07 0.852 47.8% +67 -11 -42 35.0% -0.90 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.86 2023 1533 95.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1576 104.0 -0.75 -0.94 0.755 45.2% — — — 10.0% -1.70 — 0–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1592 108.8 +2.93 -4.09 1.168 52.6% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 1621 111.9 -3.55 -2.25 0.591 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.08 — 0–2 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1640 117.0 +2.04 +0.21 1.292 53.2% +39 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1787 131.8 +0.34 -0.77 0.970 49.5% -4 -57 -51 46.1% -0.22 22–30 (42%) 40–38 (51%) 99.1 +0.38 — 1933 139.0 -2.33 +0.16 0.907 48.3% +26 -163 -164 39.9% -0.68 41–45 (48%) 51–54 (49%) 103.1 +0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.