H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Marc Gicquel vs Eduardo Schwank H2H: 1-1

Marc Gicquel and Eduardo Schwank are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marc Gicquel leads 1–0 on clay, while Eduardo Schwank leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eduardo Schwank won the 2010 Miami Open first round 4-3 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marc Gicquel
FRA Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Eduardo Schwank
ARG Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eduardo Schwank #64 4-3 (ret.) Marc Gicquel #66 Match data Mar 26, 2010* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Marc Gicquel #48 3-6 6-1 7-6(2) Eduardo Schwank #53 Match data Apr 14, 2009* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marc Gicquel #857 #37 1,448 1,787 92 113 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eduardo Schwank #1,858 #48 1,380 1,741 37 61 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marc Gicquel Eduardo Schwank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #175 1,529 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2008 15–15 50.0% #58 1,704 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2009 3–14 17.6% #118 1,573 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2010 12–21 36.4% #74 1,593 0 0
25 2002 1–1 50.0% #223 1,500 0 0 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,587 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2012 4–4 50.0% #216 1,672 0 0
27 2004 1–2 33.3% #170 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2005 3–2 60.0% #123 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2006 17–12 58.6% #50 1,750 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2007 21–25 45.7% #70 1,711 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2008 21–24 46.7% #54 1,697 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2009 21–25 45.7% #58 1,717 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2010 5–12 29.4% #151 1,642 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2012 0–1 0.0% #152 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2013 0–5 0.0% #120 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 2014 2–1 66.7% #342 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marc Gicquel Eduardo Schwank
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 4 6 10 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 4 5 20.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2 8 10 20.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 9 6 15 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 5 12 17 29.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 59 102 42.2% 26 33 59 44.1% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 6 18 66.7% — 8 20 28 28.6% 28 34 62 45.2% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marc Gicquel Eduardo Schwank
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 2.0 4.0 64.8% 42.9% 47.4% 44.4% 100.0% 44.4% 32.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 30/30 4.5 2.5 63.6% 70.4% 51.7% 68.0% 43.3% 63.6% 36.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 17/17 3.1 3.9 57.7% 61.2% 46.1% 45.4% 33.9% 54.3% 33.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 33/33 3.7 3.5 61.7% 68.2% 49.9% 45.0% 36.8% 61.3% 34.9%
25 2002 2/2 9.0 1.5 52.9% 72.9% 53.5% 87.5% 50.0% 63.1% 24.8% 2011 9/9 3.0 2.8 63.4% 67.0% 58.0% 50.9% 45.9% 63.8% 32.5%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 8/8 4.3 2.3 67.5% 68.0% 56.5% 52.6% 46.9% 64.2% 37.9%
27 2004 3/3 2.0 1.7 60.1% 62.3% 54.0% 15.7% 35.2% 59.0% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 5/5 4.8 1.8 63.1% 72.8% 48.4% 52.4% 44.6% 64.0% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 29/29 6.8 1.6 54.9% 75.8% 50.6% 66.8% 37.8% 64.1% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 46/46 6.0 1.9 57.9% 74.2% 50.2% 59.6% 38.2% 63.8% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 45/45 6.8 2.2 58.5% 73.2% 49.1% 62.8% 43.5% 63.2% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 46/46 5.8 2.8 55.7% 73.1% 51.9% 65.3% 39.3% 63.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 17/17 5.4 2.7 54.0% 69.5% 48.9% 50.4% 46.6% 59.4% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 3/3 4.3 4.3 53.8% 71.8% 52.6% 40.3% 27.8% 62.6% 28.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1/1 4.0 2.0 61.4% 72.5% 50.0% 42.9% 40.0% 63.9% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 5/5 3.2 3.8 53.0% 61.9% 43.9% 58.1% 39.2% 52.9% 27.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 3/3 7.7 1.0 64.8% 77.5% 53.7% 53.6% 41.9% 69.0% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 205/205 6.0 2.3 56.8% 73.0% 50.3% 60.8% 40.4% 63.1% 35.8% — 98/98 3.8 3.1 62.3% 67.3% 51.0% 53.3% 40.6% 61.1% 35.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marc Gicquel Eduardo Schwank
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1530 102.1 -1.83 -1.86 0.586 39.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.14
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1705 135.0 +0.30 -0.16 0.996 50.1% -118 +77 -155 47.4% +0.13 6–5 (55%) 5–10 (33%) 101.4 -0.42
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1574 112.7 -5.72 -2.82 0.735 44.5% -9 +102 -73 23.3% -1.95 2–4 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 100.2 +0.84
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1594 132.3 -1.26 -1.90 0.901 47.8% -53 +122 — 39.7% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 9–3 (75%) 101.5 +0.43
25 2002 1501 101.9 +0.60 -0.57 0.672 47.2% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 0–1 — +0.17 2011 1588 117.4 +0.98 -2.80 0.898 48.4% -54 +100 — 35.0% -0.60 0–2 3–4 (43%) — -0.03
26 2003 1471 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1673 119.1 +0.19 +1.41 1.060 50.5% — +49 — 50.0% +0.05 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.39
27 2004 1520 105.8 -1.54 -0.60 0.885 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.55 2013 1625 92.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1544 107.2 +1.50 +0.12 1.141 52.0% +14 — — 54.5% +0.27 1–0 — — 0.00 2014 1591 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1750 135.4 +1.93 -0.94 1.024 50.4% -8 -166 — 58.9% +0.30 5–4 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 102.6 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1711 135.5 +0.72 -1.60 0.962 49.2% +21 -89 -185 45.9% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 9–6 (60%) 104.0 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1697 134.8 +0.16 -0.18 0.988 49.9% -51 -11 +5 45.9% -0.16 4–8 (33%) 10–9 (53%) 96.8 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1718 138.5 +0.34 +0.15 1.022 50.3% -16 -6 -26 49.1% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 96.3 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1643 123.6 -2.04 -2.07 0.852 47.8% +67 -11 -42 35.0% -0.90 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1576 104.0 -0.75 -0.94 0.755 45.2% — — — 10.0% -1.70 — 0–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1592 108.8 +2.93 -4.09 1.168 52.6% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 1621 111.9 -3.55 -2.25 0.591 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.08 — 0–2 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1640 117.0 +2.04 +0.21 1.292 53.2% +39 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1787 131.8 +0.34 -0.77 0.970 49.5% -4 -57 -51 46.1% -0.22 22–30 (42%) 40–38 (51%) 99.1 +0.38 — 1741 127.6 -1.24 -1.34 0.901 48.1% -68 +95 -114 39.5% -0.69 10–17 (37%) 25–21 (54%) 101.4 +0.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.