H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marc Gicquel vs Evgeny Korolev H2H: 1-2
Evgeny Korolev holds a 2–1 lead over Marc Gicquel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Evgeny Korolev leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Gicquel won the 2009 Rotterdam third round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2009* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Marc Gicquel | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Evgeny Korolev | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2007* | Metz | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Evgeny Korolev | 6-4 7-6(3) | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
| Mar 21, 2007* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Evgeny Korolev | 6-4 6-2 | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Evgeny Korolev | #1,762 | #46 | 1,012 | 1,791 | 72 | 91 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Gicquel | Evgeny Korolev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #106 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #140 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #329 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |