H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Marc Gicquel vs Flavio Cipolla H2H: 0-1
Flavio Cipolla holds a 1–0 lead over Marc Gicquel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Flavio Cipolla leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Flavio Cipolla won the 2012 Montpellier third round 1-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2012* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Flavio Cipolla | 1-6 6-4 7-5 | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Flavio Cipolla | #543 | #70 | 736 | 1,786 | 35 | 66 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Gicquel | Flavio Cipolla | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #127 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #75 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #95 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #188 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |