H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Marc Gicquel vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-0
Marc Gicquel holds a 1–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marc Gicquel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Gicquel won the 2006 Chennai third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2006* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marc Gicquel | 7-5 6-4 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marc Gicquel | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |