H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Marc Gicquel vs Jerome Haehnel H2H: 1-1

Marc Gicquel and Jerome Haehnel are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Gicquel won the 2009 Montpellier Open round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marc Gicquel
FRA Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Jerome Haehnel
FRA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marc Gicquel #63 6-1 6-4 Jerome Haehnel #675 Match data Oct 29, 2009* R32 Montpellier Open ATP 250 Hard
Jerome Haehnel #185 6-4 6-2 Marc Gicquel #166 Match data Oct 15, 2004* R16 Metz International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marc Gicquel #857 #37 1,448 1,787 92 113 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jerome Haehnel #829 #78 493 1,658 8 18 30.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marc Gicquel Jerome Haehnel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 — — — — — — — 2004 7–3 70.0% #93 1,649 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 2005 1–11 8.3% #135 1,521 0 1
25 2002 1–1 50.0% #223 1,500 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #213 1,497 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #240 1,564 0 1
27 2004 1–2 33.3% #170 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2005 3–2 60.0% #123 1,544 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #591 1,583 0 1
29 2006 17–12 58.6% #50 1,750 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2007 21–25 45.7% #70 1,711 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2008 21–24 46.7% #54 1,697 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2009 21–25 45.7% #58 1,717 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2010 5–12 29.4% #151 1,642 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2012 0–1 0.0% #152 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2013 0–5 0.0% #120 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 2014 2–1 66.7% #342 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marc Gicquel Jerome Haehnel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 0 5 100.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 9 6 15 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 5 12 17 29.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 59 102 42.2% 26 33 59 44.1% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 6 18 66.7% — 6 5 11 54.5% 1 9 10 10.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marc Gicquel Jerome Haehnel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 10/10 5.0 2.6 59.7% 76.2% 55.2% 70.0% 50.6% 67.5% 34.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 12/12 3.3 3.3 55.2% 59.9% 46.2% 38.9% 30.2% 53.5% 31.5%
25 2002 2/2 9.0 1.5 52.9% 72.9% 53.5% 87.5% 50.0% 63.1% 24.8% 2006 1/1 8.0 5.0 59.4% 71.9% 33.3% 16.7% 40.0% 56.3% 39.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 2.5 3.5 53.9% 62.0% 49.2% 50.0% 41.7% 56.2% 32.4%
27 2004 3/3 2.0 1.7 60.1% 62.3% 54.0% 15.7% 35.2% 59.0% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 5/5 4.8 1.8 63.1% 72.8% 48.4% 52.4% 44.6% 64.0% 41.1% 2009 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.0% 60.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 56.0% 24.0%
29 2006 29/29 6.8 1.6 54.9% 75.8% 50.6% 66.8% 37.8% 64.1% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 46/46 6.0 1.9 57.9% 74.2% 50.2% 59.6% 38.2% 63.8% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 45/45 6.8 2.2 58.5% 73.2% 49.1% 62.8% 43.5% 63.2% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 46/46 5.8 2.8 55.7% 73.1% 51.9% 65.3% 39.3% 63.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 17/17 5.4 2.7 54.0% 69.5% 48.9% 50.4% 46.6% 59.4% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 3/3 4.3 4.3 53.8% 71.8% 52.6% 40.3% 27.8% 62.6% 28.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1/1 4.0 2.0 61.4% 72.5% 50.0% 42.9% 40.0% 63.9% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 5/5 3.2 3.8 53.0% 61.9% 43.9% 58.1% 39.2% 52.9% 27.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 3/3 7.7 1.0 64.8% 77.5% 53.7% 53.6% 41.9% 69.0% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 205/205 6.0 2.3 56.8% 73.0% 50.3% 60.8% 40.4% 63.1% 35.8% — 26/26 4.0 3.0 57.2% 66.8% 49.5% 51.3% 38.2% 59.3% 32.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marc Gicquel Jerome Haehnel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1502 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1475 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1474 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1650 122.7 +2.48 -0.18 1.055 51.2% -25 -67 — 66.7% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 +0.06
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1521 106.6 -5.05 -3.65 0.678 42.9% +97 -22 -17 10.3% -2.34 1–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.77
25 2002 1501 101.9 +0.60 -0.57 0.672 47.2% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 0–1 — +0.17 2006 1497 104.2 +0.33 +0.47 0.900 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.08
26 2003 1471 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1564 119.5 -0.44 +0.94 0.741 44.8% — — — 16.7% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.21
27 2004 1520 105.8 -1.54 -0.60 0.885 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.55 2008 1549 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1544 107.2 +1.50 +0.12 1.141 52.0% +14 — — 54.5% +0.27 1–0 — — 0.00 2009 1584 114.0 -0.34 -0.83 0.545 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.01
29 2006 1750 135.4 +1.93 -0.94 1.024 50.4% -8 -166 — 58.9% +0.30 5–4 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 102.6 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1711 135.5 +0.72 -1.60 0.962 49.2% +21 -89 -185 45.9% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 9–6 (60%) 104.0 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1697 134.8 +0.16 -0.18 0.988 49.9% -51 -11 +5 45.9% -0.16 4–8 (33%) 10–9 (53%) 96.8 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1718 138.5 +0.34 +0.15 1.022 50.3% -16 -6 -26 49.1% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 96.3 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1643 123.6 -2.04 -2.07 0.852 47.8% +67 -11 -42 35.0% -0.90 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1576 104.0 -0.75 -0.94 0.755 45.2% — — — 10.0% -1.70 — 0–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1592 108.8 +2.93 -4.09 1.168 52.6% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 1621 111.9 -3.55 -2.25 0.591 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.08 — 0–2 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1640 117.0 +2.04 +0.21 1.292 53.2% +39 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1787 131.8 +0.34 -0.77 0.970 49.5% -4 -57 -51 46.1% -0.22 22–30 (42%) 40–38 (51%) 99.1 +0.38 — 1659 118.9 -1.41 -1.70 0.802 46.3% +12 -37 -17 34.3% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 102.2 -3.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.