H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Marc Gicquel vs Jesse Levine H2H: 1-0
Marc Gicquel holds a 1–0 lead over Jesse Levine in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marc Gicquel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Gicquel won the 2009 Indianapolis fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q3 | Clay | Jesse Levine | 6-2 6-4 | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2009 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marc Gicquel | 6-2 6-2 | Jesse Levine | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jesse Levine | #691 | #69 | 720 | 1,807 | 31 | 64 | 32.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Gicquel | Jesse Levine | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #135 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #115 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #289 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #104 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #149 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |