H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marc Gicquel vs Michael Russell H2H: 1-1
Marc Gicquel and Michael Russell are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marc Gicquel leads 1–0 on grass, while Michael Russell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Gicquel won the 2010 Queen's Club second round 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2010* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Marc Gicquel | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Michael Russell | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2007* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Michael Russell | 6-3 7-5 | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Russell | #1,124 | #60 | 693 | 1,810 | 77 | 149 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Gicquel | Michael Russell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #155 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #87 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #157 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #502 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #82 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #242 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #99 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #158 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |