H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Marc Gicquel vs Zack Fleishman H2H: 1-0

Marc Gicquel holds a 1–0 lead over Zack Fleishman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marc Gicquel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Gicquel won the 2008 Los Angeles Open round of 32 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marc Gicquel
FRA Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Zack Fleishman
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marc Gicquel #119 6-4 6-2 Zack Fleishman Match data Jun 20, 2011 Q1 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Marc Gicquel #49 6-3 6-0 Zack Fleishman #437 Match data Aug 7, 2008* R32 Los Angeles Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Zack Fleishman #236 3-6 6-3 6-1 Marc Gicquel #114 Match data Jan 17, 2006* Q3 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marc Gicquel #857 #37 1,448 1,787 92 113 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Zack Fleishman #1,467 #127 337 1,605 7 17 29.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marc Gicquel Zack Fleishman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #460 1,448 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2003 2–3 40.0% #213 1,480 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #490 1,436 0 0
25 2002 1–1 50.0% #223 1,500 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #238 1,457 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2006 0–3 0.0% #169 1,472 0 0
27 2004 1–2 33.3% #170 1,520 0 0 2007 4–6 40.0% #147 1,578 0 0
28 2005 3–2 60.0% #123 1,544 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #844 1,529 0 0
29 2006 17–12 58.6% #50 1,750 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2007 21–25 45.7% #70 1,711 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2008 21–24 46.7% #54 1,697 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2009 21–25 45.7% #58 1,717 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2010 5–12 29.4% #151 1,642 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2012 0–1 0.0% #152 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2013 0–5 0.0% #120 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 2014 2–1 66.7% #342 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marc Gicquel Zack Fleishman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 9 6 15 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 5 12 17 29.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 59 102 42.2% 26 33 59 44.1% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 6 18 66.7% — 6 15 21 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marc Gicquel Zack Fleishman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 1/1 5.0 4.0 52.9% 77.8% 45.8% 33.3% 0.0% 62.7% 26.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 5/5 6.2 4.0 56.8% 68.5% 40.3% 62.2% 48.8% 55.9% 39.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 3.5 3.0 57.6% 67.2% 33.6% 47.3% 33.3% 53.0% 26.8%
25 2002 2/2 9.0 1.5 52.9% 72.9% 53.5% 87.5% 50.0% 63.1% 24.8% 2005 2/2 5.5 1.5 62.4% 68.5% 68.3% 40.0% 28.6% 68.4% 28.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 5.7 4.7 49.6% 72.3% 45.4% 53.7% 26.0% 58.6% 29.6%
27 2004 3/3 2.0 1.7 60.1% 62.3% 54.0% 15.7% 35.2% 59.0% 36.3% 2007 10/10 6.3 3.6 53.5% 70.7% 48.7% 55.4% 50.0% 60.6% 28.2%
28 2005 5/5 4.8 1.8 63.1% 72.8% 48.4% 52.4% 44.6% 64.0% 41.1% 2008 1/1 4.0 4.0 54.1% 40.0% 47.1% 20.0% 0.0% 43.2% 27.1%
29 2006 29/29 6.8 1.6 54.9% 75.8% 50.6% 66.8% 37.8% 64.1% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 46/46 6.0 1.9 57.9% 74.2% 50.2% 59.6% 38.2% 63.8% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 45/45 6.8 2.2 58.5% 73.2% 49.1% 62.8% 43.5% 63.2% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 46/46 5.8 2.8 55.7% 73.1% 51.9% 65.3% 39.3% 63.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 17/17 5.4 2.7 54.0% 69.5% 48.9% 50.4% 46.6% 59.4% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 3/3 4.3 4.3 53.8% 71.8% 52.6% 40.3% 27.8% 62.6% 28.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1/1 4.0 2.0 61.4% 72.5% 50.0% 42.9% 40.0% 63.9% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 5/5 3.2 3.8 53.0% 61.9% 43.9% 58.1% 39.2% 52.9% 27.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 3/3 7.7 1.0 64.8% 77.5% 53.7% 53.6% 41.9% 69.0% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 205/205 6.0 2.3 56.8% 73.0% 50.3% 60.8% 40.4% 63.1% 35.8% — 24/24 5.8 3.6 54.8% 69.0% 46.7% 52.3% 39.4% 58.7% 30.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marc Gicquel Zack Fleishman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1483 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1449 98.7 -0.19 -2.29 0.721 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.05
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1481 105.1 -4.21 -0.35 0.889 48.0% +12 — — 41.7% -0.33 1–1 0–1 — +0.51
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1437 94.5 -3.25 -0.22 0.569 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04
25 2002 1501 101.9 +0.60 -0.57 0.672 47.2% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 0–1 — +0.17 2005 1458 105.5 -0.62 -1.75 0.910 48.4% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 — — -0.03
26 2003 1471 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1472 106.7 -1.50 -3.03 0.716 45.5% +3 — — 22.2% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.29
27 2004 1520 105.8 -1.54 -0.60 0.885 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.55 2007 1578 124.1 -1.01 -3.01 0.716 45.4% -23 — — 38.5% -1.00 1–0 4–0 (100%) — -0.71
28 2005 1544 107.2 +1.50 +0.12 1.141 52.0% +14 — — 54.5% +0.27 1–0 — — 0.00 2008 1529 94.6 -2.12 -0.94 0.477 34.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.08
29 2006 1750 135.4 +1.93 -0.94 1.024 50.4% -8 -166 — 58.9% +0.30 5–4 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 102.6 +0.08 2009 1506 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1711 135.5 +0.72 -1.60 0.962 49.2% +21 -89 -185 45.9% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 9–6 (60%) 104.0 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1697 134.8 +0.16 -0.18 0.988 49.9% -51 -11 +5 45.9% -0.16 4–8 (33%) 10–9 (53%) 96.8 +0.69 2011 1460 98.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1718 138.5 +0.34 +0.15 1.022 50.3% -16 -6 -26 49.1% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 96.3 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1643 123.6 -2.04 -2.07 0.852 47.8% +67 -11 -42 35.0% -0.90 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1576 104.0 -0.75 -0.94 0.755 45.2% — — — 10.0% -1.70 — 0–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1592 108.8 +2.93 -4.09 1.168 52.6% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2013 1621 111.9 -3.55 -2.25 0.591 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.08 — 0–2 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1640 117.0 +2.04 +0.21 1.292 53.2% +39 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1787 131.8 +0.34 -0.77 0.970 49.5% -4 -57 -51 46.1% -0.22 22–30 (42%) 40–38 (51%) 99.1 +0.38 — 1606 110.8 -1.90 -2.00 0.740 45.2% -11 — — 31.7% -1.15 3–2 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 103.7 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.