H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Marc Gicquel vs Zack Fleishman H2H: 1-0
Marc Gicquel holds a 1–0 lead over Zack Fleishman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marc Gicquel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Gicquel won the 2008 Los Angeles third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2011 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q1 | Grass | Marc Gicquel | 6-4 6-2 | Zack Fleishman | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2008* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marc Gicquel | 6-3 6-0 | Zack Fleishman | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q3 | Hard | Zack Fleishman | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zack Fleishman | #1,467 | #127 | 337 | 1,621 | 7 | 17 | 29.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Gicquel | Zack Fleishman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #213 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #844 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |