H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Marc Kevin Goellner vs Leander Paes H2H: 0-1
Leander Paes holds a 1–0 lead over Marc Kevin Goellner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 1993 Toulouse third round 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 55
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1993* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Leander Paes | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Marc Kevin Goellner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Kevin Goellner | #1,172 | #26 | 1,072 | 1,841 | 152 | 188 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Kevin Goellner | Leander Paes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #78 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #53 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 22–34 | 39.3% | #51 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #118 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #324 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #189 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #176 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |