H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marc Rosset vs Andres Gomez H2H: 1-2
Andres Gomez holds a 2–1 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Andres Gomez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Rosset won the 1992 Madrid fourth round 7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 66
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1992* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marc Rosset | 7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(4) | Andres Gomez | Match data |
| May 6, 1990* | Madrid | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Andres Gomez | 6-3 7-6 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Oct 6, 1989* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andres Gomez | 6-3 6-3 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Andres Gomez | #1,171 | #4 | 2,005 | 2,092 | 502 | 261 | 65.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Rosset | Andres Gomez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 51–25 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #5 | 2,072 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 | 1986 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #10 | 1,898 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 | 1987 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #11 | 1,913 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 | 1988 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #24 | 1,808 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 | 1989 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,868 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 | 1990 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #6 | 1,726 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #70 | 1,722 | 1 | 21 |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 | 1992 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,676 | 1 | 21 |
| 33 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 | 1993 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #402 | 1,606 | 1 | 21 |