H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Marc Rosset vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 6-3

Marc Rosset holds a 6–3 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Marc Rosset leads 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marc Rosset won the 2000 Paris Masters round of 32 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marc Rosset
SUI Age 55 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
6 – 3
9 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marc Rosset #31 7-5 7-5 Cedric Pioline #15 Match data Nov 16, 2000* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Marc Rosset #39 6-4 3-6 4-6 7-6(5) 13-11 Cedric Pioline #10 Match data Jun 24, 1998* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Cedric Pioline #16 6-3 6-4 Marc Rosset #29 Match data Mar 11, 1998* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Marc Rosset #30 6-1 6-4 Cedric Pioline #20 Match data Feb 14, 1998* SF St. Petersburg ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Marc Rosset #13 7-5 6-7(3) 6-1 Cedric Pioline #42 Match data Aug 26, 1995* QF Long Island ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Marc Rosset #30 6-4 6-4 Cedric Pioline #15 Match data Aug 28, 1993* QF Long Island ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Marc Rosset #46 7-6(1) 6-1 Cedric Pioline #37 Match data Nov 14, 1992* SF Moscow ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Cedric Pioline #51 6-3 7-5 Marc Rosset #49 Match data Mar 4, 1992* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Cedric Pioline #111 7-5 6-3 Marc Rosset #31 Match data May 15, 1991* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marc Rosset #1,490 #9 2,069 1,956 406 335 54.8% 0 1 0 0 2 12 15
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marc Rosset Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #474 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 7–2 77.8% #45 1,613 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1990 35–23 60.3% #22 1,812 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1991 18–28 39.1% #60 1,649 0 2 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 1992 37–22 62.7% #35 1,879 0 4 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1993 46–21 68.7% #16 1,942 0 7 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1994 46–27 63.0% #14 1,931 0 9 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0
24 1995 38–21 64.4% #15 1,814 0 11 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1996 33–28 54.1% #22 1,784 0 11 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 1997 32–31 50.8% #31 1,630 0 12 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 1998 27–27 50.0% #31 1,745 0 12 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 1999 26–27 49.1% #45 1,658 0 13 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 2000 31–25 55.4% #28 1,733 0 15 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 2001 12–23 34.3% #119 1,603 0 15 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 2002 8–12 40.0% #101 1,598 0 15 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 2003 6–9 40.0% #122 1,587 0 15 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 2004 4–8 33.3% #214 1,547 0 15 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marc Rosset Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1 6 7 14.3% 22 11 33 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 10 9 19 52.6% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 19 5 24 79.2% 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1994 21 14 35 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 18 4 22 81.8% 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 1995 11 9 20 55.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1996 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 1997 17 12 29 58.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 1998 13 13 26 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 1999 13 11 24 54.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 2000 16 12 28 57.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 2002 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 154 134 288 53.5% 112 102 214 52.3% 26 31 57 45.6% 114 68 182 62.6% — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 592/673 of Marc Rosset's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marc Rosset Cedric Pioline
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 45/46 7.8 3.6 54.9% 77.0% 46.8% 53.3% 32.5% 63.3% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 48/59 8.9 3.8 57.4% 77.3% 50.4% 57.4% 42.5% 66.0% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 62/67 9.9 3.6 58.7% 79.4% 50.7% 65.4% 39.9% 67.5% 38.7% 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4%
23 1994 66/73 10.0 5.1 57.1% 79.2% 48.8% 64.6% 40.2% 66.3% 38.4% 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9%
24 1995 50/59 9.3 4.8 55.3% 79.3% 50.6% 63.9% 41.2% 66.6% 37.1% 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4%
25 1996 48/61 10.9 4.6 58.8% 80.6% 48.5% 63.0% 45.0% 67.5% 35.7% 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9%
26 1997 54/63 7.7 5.8 55.4% 76.0% 45.8% 57.7% 38.9% 62.7% 37.2% 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6%
27 1998 48/54 9.6 6.4 54.6% 79.0% 46.3% 50.1% 31.9% 64.3% 35.9% 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6%
28 1999 47/53 9.9 6.9 53.7% 79.4% 46.8% 63.0% 41.5% 64.5% 36.4% 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6%
29 2000 49/56 10.0 6.2 57.6% 77.0% 47.8% 55.6% 39.3% 64.3% 36.5% 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3%
30 2001 30/35 9.4 7.5 56.2% 74.8% 42.5% 60.1% 40.5% 60.7% 32.0% 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2%
31 2002 18/20 13.6 7.3 57.8% 78.0% 49.5% 63.8% 40.4% 66.0% 32.4% 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5%
32 2003 15/15 10.3 7.7 56.3% 76.6% 46.2% 64.8% 45.0% 63.4% 33.4% 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9%
33 2004 12/12 9.2 4.6 58.6% 76.7% 45.3% 51.6% 37.4% 64.2% 31.7% 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6%
Career — 592/741 9.6 5.3 56.5% 78.2% 48.0% 59.9% 39.6% 65.1% 36.4% — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marc Rosset Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1614 132.6 — — — — — +46 — 73.7% +2.00 1–0 — — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1812 141.5 — — — — -150 -4 -202 54.4% +0.13 18–6 (75%) 17–7 (71%) 120.8 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1649 138.9 +2.30 -1.77 0.989 49.4% +23 +47 — 45.5% -0.40 3–12 (20%) 5–6 (45%) 89.3 -0.07 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41
21 1992 1880 156.4 +3.97 -0.48 1.074 51.0% -52 -9 -248 59.7% +0.63 13–9 (59%) 15–9 (63%) 109.5 -4.83 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10
22 1993 1942 153.8 +5.65 +0.59 1.191 52.8% +30 -111 — 65.8% +0.89 13–7 (65%) 16–12 (57%) 104.7 -0.51 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32
23 1994 1931 148.4 +4.31 +0.54 1.138 51.9% +40 -202 -306 59.7% +0.31 13–10 (57%) 26–12 (68%) 104.7 -0.29 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91
24 1995 1815 145.3 +3.76 -0.37 1.111 51.7% +19 +11 -111 60.8% +0.67 10–7 (59%) 18–15 (55%) 101.8 +1.03 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16
25 1996 1784 147.2 +4.82 -1.13 1.097 51.5% +4 +62 -40 55.5% +0.36 12–13 (48%) 14–14 (50%) 96.3 +0.64 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27
26 1997 1631 133.6 +1.06 -0.88 0.997 49.8% +7 +208 +88 51.3% +0.01 12–8 (60%) 14–15 (48%) 97.9 +1.44 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16
27 1998 1745 145.3 +1.96 -0.58 1.005 49.5% +36 -39 -45 50.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 13–11 (54%) 104.6 -1.59 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10
28 1999 1658 138.7 +2.15 -0.73 1.026 50.4% +83 -45 -24 49.6% +0.20 8–8 (50%) 8–15 (35%) 94.0 +1.75 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00
29 2000 1733 140.8 +2.25 -0.56 1.023 50.0% +41 -77 -59 57.2% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 10–14 (42%) 99.5 +0.28 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97
30 2001 1604 126.4 -1.32 -4.04 0.816 46.8% +95 -7 -35 33.7% -0.93 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) 101.7 -0.48 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23
31 2002 1599 127.6 +2.47 -3.30 0.951 49.2% +56 +4 -18 46.9% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 8–7 (53%) 98.2 -0.72 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89
32 2003 1587 123.1 +1.30 -1.92 0.911 48.7% +50 — -17 40.0% -0.77 0–1 7–3 (70%) — -0.48 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75
33 2004 1548 116.7 +0.60 -3.15 0.886 47.7% +75 +9 — 40.7% -0.67 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 98.4 -0.43 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76
Career — 1956 148.8 +2.94 -0.82 1.042 50.5% +22 +2 -83 54.3% +0.21 129–108 (54%) 183–150 (55%) 105.7 -0.42 — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.