H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Marc Rosset vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 6-3

Marc Rosset holds a 6–3 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Marc Rosset leads 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marc Rosset won the 2000 Paris Masters third round 7-5 7-5.

SUI Age 55 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
6 3
9 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 16, 2000* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Marc Rosset #31 7-5 7-5 Cedric Pioline #15 Match data
Jun 24, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Marc Rosset #39 6-4 3-6 4-6 7-6(5) 13-11 Cedric Pioline #10 Match data
Mar 11, 1998* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Cedric Pioline #16 6-3 6-4 Marc Rosset #29 Match data
Feb 14, 1998* St. Petersburg ATP 250 SF Carpet Marc Rosset #30 6-1 6-4 Cedric Pioline #20 Match data
Aug 26, 1995* Long Island ATP 250 QF Hard Marc Rosset #13 7-5 6-7(3) 6-1 Cedric Pioline #42 Match data
Aug 28, 1993* Long Island ATP 250 QF Hard Marc Rosset #30 6-4 6-4 Cedric Pioline #15 Match data
Nov 14, 1992* Moscow ATP 250 SF Carpet Marc Rosset #46 7-6(1) 6-1 Cedric Pioline #37 Match data
Mar 4, 1992* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Cedric Pioline #51 6-3 7-5 Marc Rosset #49 Match data
May 15, 1991* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Cedric Pioline #111 7-5 6-3 Marc Rosset #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marc Rosset #1,490 #9 2,069 1,950 398 334 54.4% 0 0 0 0 14 14
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marc Rosset Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #474 1,488 0 0
18 1989 7–2 77.8% #45 1,613 0 1
19 1990 35–23 60.3% #22 1,811 0 2
20 1991 18–28 39.1% #60 1,648 0 2 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1992 31–22 58.5% #35 1,826 0 3 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1993 46–21 68.7% #16 1,922 0 6 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1994 46–27 63.0% #14 1,925 0 8 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1995 38–21 64.4% #15 1,814 0 10 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1996 31–27 53.4% #22 1,771 0 10 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1997 32–31 50.8% #31 1,630 0 11 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1998 27–27 50.0% #31 1,749 0 11 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1999 26–27 49.1% #45 1,658 0 12 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2000 31–25 55.4% #28 1,723 0 14 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2001 12–23 34.3% #119 1,601 0 14 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2002 8–12 40.0% #101 1,597 0 14 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2003 6–9 40.0% #122 1,586 0 14 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2004 4–8 33.3% #214 1,546 0 14 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5