H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Marc Rosset vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 2-2
Marc Rosset and Guillaume Raoux are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Marc Rosset leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1996 Rotterdam quarterfinal 7-6(10) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 1996* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Guillaume Raoux | 7-6(10) 6-4 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1995* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Marc Rosset | 6-4 6-2 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
| Apr 26, 1995* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Marc Rosset | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1991* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Guillaume Raoux | 5-7 6-3 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Rosset | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |