H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Marc Rosset vs J. Palmer H2H: 2-1
Marc Rosset holds a 2–1 lead over J. Palmer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Marc Rosset leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, J. Palmer won the 1996 US Open first round 6-7(7) 6-4 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | J. Palmer | 6-7(7) 6-4 6-4 6-3 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1995* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Marc Rosset | 7-6(5) 6-3 | J. Palmer | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1993* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Marc Rosset | 6-4 6-2 | J. Palmer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| J. Palmer | #1,385 | #35 | 908 | 1,812 | 69 | 80 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marc Rosset | J. Palmer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #517 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #240 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #564 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #427 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #105 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #125 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #214 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #435 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #357 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |